6758 items matching your search terms
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CJC-127 IN THE MATTER OF The Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 10 May 2021 held in Cromwell Court: Environment Judge J E B
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER OF the Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 08 March 2021 held in Dunedin Court: Environment Ju
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER OF the Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 08 March 2021 held in Dunedin Court: Environment Ju
DOUBLE SIDED Decision No, C\ <; 1 12003 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 IN THE MATTER of an appeal under section 120 of the Act BETWEEN CLIFFORD BAY MARINE FARMS LIMITED (RMA 172/03) THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CONSERVATION (RMA 103/01) FIDENDS OF NELSON HAVEN AND TASMAN BAY (INC) (RMA 114/01) Appellants MARLBOROUGH DISTIDCT COUNCIL Respondent BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT Environment Judge J R Jackson (presiding) Environment Commissioner C E
...a 30 year transition period was negotiated to enable reasonable expectations to be realized from the investment. This factored into the decision making of the Parliament when considering the RMA, and the transition period was written into the legislation. 57 OFG submitted on the development of the RMA at the time and argued unsuccessfully for a much shorter phase-out period for mining privileges (five years) because of the continuing adverse impacts on Central Otago stream ecosy...
Court: IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN AND AND Judge J A Smith Commissioner S C Myers 1 Decision [2021] NZEnvC o:\6 an appeal under Clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) in relation to Topic 8 Agrichemicals of the proposed Northland Regional Plan POPULATION AND PUBLIC HEALTH UNIT OF THE NORTHLAND DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD (ENV-2019-AKL-126) HORTICULTURE NEW Z
িবে�ষ ও ৈবষম� �েরাচনার িব�ে� ��াবসমূহ ি সূিচপ� ন�ায় ম�ী েথেক ভূিমকা ....................................................................................................... 3 ��াবসমূেহর সংি��সার .................................................................................................... 5 িবে�ষ/শ�ত
...‘victim’ accurately conveys their experience of harm. Still others, including many Māori, want no label at all. This report uses the term ‘victim’ for the following reasons: • to maintain consistency with current Aotearoa New Zealand legislation (for example, the Victims’ Rights Act 2002) • most criminal justice system workers and stakeholders recognise the term. It may be that through future consultation with those who have been victimised, we can find a better...
Aupouri Aquifer: Director-General of Conservation v Northland Regional Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 016 IN THE MATTER OF the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for Water Take consents from the Te Aupōuri Aquifer BETWEEN DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF CONSERVATION (ENV-2021-AKL-129) Appellant AND NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent Court: Ju
LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2024] NZLCRO 024 Ref: LCRO 149/2023 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN HV Applicant AND BQ Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed Introduction [1] The applicant ha