Search Results

1. [2025] NZIACDT 15 – ZJ v Liu (26 February 2025) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...51 Disciplinary sanctions (1) The sanctions that the Tribunal may impose are— (a) caution or censure: (b) a requirement to undertake specified training or otherwise remedy any deficiency within a specified period: (c) suspension of licence for the unexpired period of the licence, or until the person meets specified conditions: (d) cancellation of licence: (e) an order preventing the person from reapplying for a licence for a period not exceeding 2 years, or until the...

2. [2025] NZIACDT 18 – YI v Liu (27 February 2025) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...51 Disciplinary sanctions (1) The sanctions that the Tribunal may impose are— (a) caution or censure: (b) a requirement to undertake specified training or otherwise remedy any deficiency within a specified period: (c) suspension of licence for the unexpired period of the licence, or until the person meets specified conditions: (d) cancellation of licence: (e) an order preventing the person from reapplying for a licence for a period not exceeding 2 years, or until the...

3. [2025] NZIACDT 19 – DH v Liu (28 February 2025) [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...51 Disciplinary sanctions (1) The sanctions that the Tribunal may impose are— (a) caution or censure: (b) a requirement to undertake specified training or otherwise remedy any deficiency within a specified period: (c) suspension of licence for the unexpired period of the licence, or until the person meets specified conditions: (d) cancellation of licence: (e) an order preventing the person from reapplying for a licence for a period not exceeding 2 years, or until the...

4. [2025] NZIACDT 16 – TX v Liu (26 February 2025) [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...51 Disciplinary sanctions (1) The sanctions that the Tribunal may impose are— (a) caution or censure: (b) a requirement to undertake specified training or otherwise remedy any deficiency within a specified period: (c) suspension of licence for the unexpired period of the licence, or until the person meets specified conditions: (d) cancellation of licence: (e) an order preventing the person from reapplying for a licence for a period not exceeding 2 years, or until the...

5. [2025] NZIACDT 17 – IX v Liu (26 February 2025) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...51 Disciplinary sanctions (1) The sanctions that the Tribunal may impose are— (a) caution or censure: (b) a requirement to undertake specified training or otherwise remedy any deficiency within a specified period: (c) suspension of licence for the unexpired period of the licence, or until the person meets specified conditions: (d) cancellation of licence: (e) an order preventing the person from reapplying for a licence for a period not exceeding 2 years, or until the...

6. LCRO 126-2017 PC v The Committee [pdf, 281 KB]

   ...register [following which] indefeasibility of title takes effect” Mr PC’s contravention of r 2.5 “was significant”. (i) By completing his certificate and submitting the transfer instrument for registration, Mr PC had “misused his LINZ licence and digital certificate”. (j) It was not open to Mr PC “to have relied on the directions from his colleague, albeit a senior colleague whom Mr PC says was his direct superior”. This is because e-dealing certifications, as wit...

7. Bennett - Estate of Ronald Clifford Bennett (2017) 156 Waiariki MB 250 (156 WAR 250) [pdf, 241 KB]

   ...deed indicate that Ronald and Janet were to own the house jointly. They are both described as “the Borrower” under the deed, and all provisions refer to them in a joint capacity as opposed to having separate rights as tenants in common. The licence to occupy the dwelling site was granted to both Ronald and Janet, and the schedule to the deed provides that the term of the licence is for: … the lifetime of R I and J I BENNETT or for 30 years whichever is the longer. [26] Joint...

8. NJUM v Vole [2020] NZIACDT 5 (29 January 2020) [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...professional misconduct. BACKGROUND [4] Mr Vole is a director of Telestial General Consultancy Services Ltd, of Auckland. [5] The complainant and her husband married in Samoa in 2011. The marriage was not registered because they did not take the licence to the registry office. [6] The complainant’s husband successfully registered with Immigration New Zealand in Samoa under the Samoan Quota in 2013, at a time when the complainant and her husband were living together. Howeve...

9. NE v LBC [2014] NZIACDT 8 (05 February 2014) [pdf, 39 KB]

   ...complainant lodged a Statement of Reply. His position was: [5.1] He accepted another person lodged the first application, but thought the adviser should be responsible as he was “operating under” that person. [5.2] He said the adviser held a licence at the time of the second application. [6] The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction over persons who are not licensed. Any complaint lies against the lawyer who apparently had responsibility for filing the application. The Tribunal makes...

10. IACDT Chair - Position profile [pdf, 143 KB]

    ...the option to appoint additional members). The Tribunal’s functions are to: • consider complaints about immigration advisers referred to it by the Registrar of Immigration Advisers • make decisions as to whether an immigration adviser’s licence should be suspended pending the determination of a complaint • hear appeals against a decision by the Registrar to cancel a licence of an immigration adviser • hear appeals against decisions by the Registrar to reject a complain...