Search Results

1. Alice Wouters v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 412) & Thomas Richadson [2017] NZREADT 60 [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...Wouters alleged that Mr Richardson had: 1 Complaint No. C15274, re Thomas Richardson, Decision to take no further action, 22 May 2017. 2 Mr Richardson voluntarily surrendered his salesperson’s licence in March 2016. [a] not made written disclosure of his interest in the transaction as vendor (as is required by ss 134–137 of the Act); [b] misrepresented to her that the balance land would be subdivided into nine lots, each of...

2. [2022] NZIACDT 11 - BU v McCarthy (18 May 2022) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...explain them. BACKGROUND [3] The complainant’s daughter-in-law is a national of [Country] who was in New Zealand unlawfully. [4] Mr McCarthy was a licensed immigration adviser and director of Corporate Migration NZ Ltd, of Masterton. His licence expired on 27 April 2022 and he is no longer licensed. [5] The complainant’s son, a New Zealand citizen and husband of the daughter-in- law, approached Mr McCarthy in about December 2017 requesting assistance with a s 61 request fo...

3. 2023 NZPSPLA 038.pdf [pdf, 112 KB]

   ...had committed an offence under s 240(1)(c) of the Crimes Act but proposed a resolution of a formal warning and reparation of $568.75. Mr Signal accepted this resolution offer. [5] Mr Webb considers Mr Signal should also be accountable from a licencing perspective. He says Mr Signal is guilty of misconduct and is no longer suitable to be a certificate holder. [6] Mr Signal denies he is guilty of misconduct and says any contravention of the Act was more the responsibility of Mr We...

4. [2018] NZIACDT 28 - SB v Atia (8 August 2018) [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...[7.1] Refunding the balance of the fees paid ($1,500 plus GST less a refund of $287 already made). [7.2] Undertaking the refresher course proposed by the Registrar. [7.3] Payment of costs. [8] Ms Atia through her counsel advanced reasons why her licence should not be cancelled. 4 [9] The complainant raised a number of matters relating to the payment of compensation. For present purposes, it is sufficient to note that the claim of $49,196.64 is contentious because th...

5. [2013] NZEmpC 40 B v Virgin Australia (NZ) Employment & Crewing Ltd [pdf, 356 KB]

   ...nor was she asked about fasting or diet pills. [75] On 5 February 2010 CAA wrote to Mr Lowe advising him that it had commenced its fit and proper person investigation and that it was supportive of the company’s suspension of the plaintiff’s licence until the matter was resolved. This, it said, was consistent with effective risk management. [76] Mr McCabe emailed Mr Lowe on 16 February 2010 attaching what appeared to be an email from the Police advising that their investigation...

6. J Ltd v TQ [2024] NZDT 34 (15 February 2024) [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...to J Ltd by no later than 8 March 2024. Reasons: 1. J Ltd claim a man, now known to be TQ, entered their premises on 8 November 2023 and purported to be interested in buying a car. When TQ asked to test drive [car 1], he presented a drivers licence in the name of CE as identification. J Ltd then let TQ drive, with the salesperson accompanying him. However when TQ attempted to drive the car out of the yard, he collided with [car 2] parked nearby, causing damage to [car 2]’s bump...

7. 2025 NZPSPLA 063.pdf [pdf, 86 KB]

   ...this Authority. [7] Unsatisfactory conduct has a lower threshold and the potential penalties that can be imposed if unsatisfactory conduct is established do not include the suspension or cancellation of the person’s certificate of approval or licence. Misconduct is defined as: 1 All parties’ names have been anonymised in this decision. 2 a) Conduct that falls short of the standard that a reasonable member of the public is entitled to expect from a reasonably compete...

8. Muller v Yerman [2015] NZIACDT 77 (25 June 2015) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...did not obtain an offer of employment. It was up to him to secure this offer.” [19] Unfortunately, Ms Yerman’s response fails to consider the 2010 Code has the status of statutory regulations of New Zealand. She has the privilege of holding a licence issued by the 6 New Zealand Government allowing her to provide professional services. It is not for Ms Yerman to decide whether she will comply with the 2010 Code, as failing to comply with it involves breaking the laws of...

9. Whaanga v Whaanga - Town Section 90 Mahia and Town Section 91 Mahia (2014) 42 Tairawhiti MB 292 (42 TRW 292) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...payment of any rent; and (ii) The lessee or any other person in occupation of the land or part of the land neglects or refuses to quit and deliver up possession of the land: (b) Where the occupier of any Maori freehold land under a lease or licence, either written or verbal, is in arrear in the payment of rent for such period that the lessor or the licensor is entitled to exercise a right of re-entry under the terms of the lease or licence: 42 Tairawhiti MB 300 (c) Whe...

10. BP v YF LCRO 142 / 2010 (24 March 2011) [pdf, 98 KB]

    ...details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Background [1] The Applicant was convicted of indecent assault in 2002. [2] One of the outcomes of that was that the Instructor and Passenger endorsements on his driver‟s licence were revoked and he lost his livelihood by reason of the fact that he was unable to be employed as a bus or taxi driver or operate his driving instructor‟s business. [3] Since then he had endeavoured to have these endorsements...