Search Results

1. Te Manutukutuku Issue 4 [pdf, 3 MB]

   ...1953. Forest lands The Crown is also selling the exotic forests. Claims to the Tribunal concerning these forest lands are also 'protected' in a similar way to lands in the ownership of state-owned enterprises. The Crown will only seU a licence to cut trees to the buyers of the forests, but the land under the forest may still be returned to Maori claimants if the Tribunal orders this. If the Tribunal orders the return of the land under a forest licence, this return will take...

2. [2020] NZREADT 20 - AJS Rental Ltd - penalty (1 May 2020) [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...As relevant to the present case the Tribunal may: [a] Make any of the orders that a Complaints Assessment Committee may impose under s 93 of the Act; [b] Impose a fine of up to $30,000; [c] Order cancellation or suspension of the licensee’s licence; Submissions [14] Ms Woolley submitted for the Committee that the aim of deterrence would appropriately be met if AJS were censured, and ordered to pay a fine of between $20,000 and $25,000. She submitted that such a penalty would...

3. Norman v Pohatu - Te Hapua 42 (2022) 256 Taitokerau MB 1 (256 TTK 1) [pdf, 279 KB]

   ...Mr Neho and Ms Karaka have retired from the committee. I only have to consider whether Marama Pohatu and Pani Petera should be removed. [3] Mr Norman seeks to remove those members on the following grounds: (a) The committee failed to issue a licence to occupy to Tom Murray; (b) The committee adopted postal voting rather than voting in person on an important shareholders’ vote; (c) The committee failed to complete the partition of Pakohu 2B2AJ; (d) The committee failed to upda...

4. [2022] NZEmpC 57 Rockit Packing Company Ltd v Mortimer [pdf, 277 KB]

   ...According to Mr Williames, Mr Mortimer advanced the loan in June 2020, at the same time as a shareholders’ agreement was entered into between the shareholders in CPI. [12] The first agreement to supply a machine and provide for an associated licence fee for its use was signed by Rockit Group and CPI in February 2019. A second supply agreement was entered into in September 2019 but for a longer term with an increased licence fee. There is a dispute over why changes were made betw...

5. Rostami v Accident Compensation Corporation (claim for weekly compensation injury) [2022] NZACC 240 [pdf, 170 KB]

   ...Toyota Repair Receipts dated 26 March 2021: these reflect car repairs with the customer listed as Mr Zikrulla Khan Aga. (c) Licenses Building Practitioner Details dated 6 April 2021: these reflect that Mr Rostami was granted a Building Practitioner licence on 6 April 2021, with the company involved being Precision Construction Ltd. 7 Relevant law [18] Section 100(1)(c) provides that a claimant who has cover and who lodges a claim for weekly compensation is entitled to receive...

6. T Ltd v G Ltd [2024] NZDT 519 (2 July 2024) [pdf, 156 KB]

   ...agreement with G Ltd in 2020 he had hoped he would be able to grow the business over several years in this region. He said he spent money on advertising both locally and nationally. He said the original distributor agreements gave him an exclusive licence in this region. He says that the new Authorised Reseller agreements do not offer that and are very different to the agreement he had with G Ltd. TD also referred to issues that had arisen over the years regarding availability of product...

7. 20241211 Gene Technology Bill [pdf, 249 KB]

   ...Regulator. A further example is clause 125(3), which enables the Regulator to require a person requesting a review of a decision to supply additional information. Regulations may also be made prescribing the information that must be provided with a licence application and prescribing reporting requirements. These can all be categorised as provisions that require the provision of information to authorities. 11. Under section 5 of the Bill of Rights Act, a limit on a right may be justi...

8. 27-Sept-2022-Redacted-SAR-for-publication-suggested-redactions2.pdf [pdf, 5.6 MB]

   ...combination of Options 2, 2A, and 2B. Option 2: New offence of discharging a firearm with intent to intimidate. Option 2A: Additional consequences on conviction for new offence to qualify for a Firearms Prohibition Order and be subject to licence disqualification. Option 2B: Enabling trespass surveillance and use of interception device to investigate new offence. Proposal B: New warranted search powers to address and respond to gang conflict When gang co...

9. Supplementary Analysis Report Criminal Activity Intervention Legislation Bill [pdf, 5.6 MB]

   ...combination of Options 2, 2A, and 2B. Option 2: New offence of discharging a firearm with intent to intimidate. Option 2A: Additional consequences on conviction for new offence to qualify for a Firearms Prohibition Order and be subject to licence disqualification. Option 2B: Enabling trespass surveillance and use of interception device to investigate new offence. Proposal B: New warranted search powers to address and respond to gang conflict When gang co...

10. Stock v Morris - Wainui 2D2B (2012) 41 Taitokerau MB 121 (41 TTK 121) [pdf, 259 KB]

    ...blocks administered by the Trust. The Trust was constituted in 1986 to promote papakainga development on the land blocks. [4] In about 1991 Mariao and her late husband built a home (“the family home”) on the land. The Trust granted Mariao a licence to occupy for 30 years. The licence to occupy is a standard tripartite deed used by Housing Corporation of New Zealand (“HCNZ”) at the time. HCNZ lent the money to build the family home. At the date of hearing Mariao still owe...