Search Results

1. ZH v Ma [2025] NZIACDT 30 (6 June 2025) [pdf, 311 KB]

   ...Licensing Act 2007 (Act). BACKGROUND [3] Tzu-Tong Jane Ma was at the relevant time a self-employed licensed immigration adviser, who traded under her own name or Colab Ltd or New Zealand Immigration Concepts. She was based in Auckland. Her licence was suspended by the Tribunal effective 2 April 2024, for the reasons given in the notice. [4] The complainant is ZH, a national of China. [5] The complainant purportedly signed an employment agreement on 10 March 2023 with A Ltd L...

2. 2023 NZLASDP 002 [pdf, 554 KB]

3. 2023 NZLASDP 002.pdf [pdf, 554 KB]

4. About family violence and Protection Orders [pdf, 453 KB]

   ...family group conference, restorative justice conference, settlement conference under the Care of Children Act or any court proceedings. WEAPONS ARE BANNED When a temporary Protection Order is made, the respondent must give the Police any firearms licence they hold and any weapons they have. Weapons means any firearm, airgun, pistol, restricted weapon, ammunition or explosive. If the Protection Order is made final, the respondent’s firearms licence will be cancelled. 7 Can I stay...

5. Canterbury Westland Standards Committee v Woulfe [2017] NZLCDT 5 [pdf, 122 KB]

   ...least one previous occasion. [7] Mr Woulfe’s evidence is that he only intended to certify that he had witnessed Mr Smith’s signature on the A & I form, and had sent the form, along with the certified copy of the copy of the driver’s licence and other documents to Mr Smith to take away for M’s signature, intending that another lawyer would witness those. [8] Mr Woulfe says his failure was in not noticing that M’s signature had appeared on the document after it was r...

6. MOJ0648_About-Family-Violence-and-Protection-Orders_booklet_JUN21_WEB.pdf [pdf, 346 KB]

   ...group conference, restorative justice conference, settlement conference under the Care of Children Act 2004 or any court proceedings. WEAPONS ARE BANNED When a temporary Protection Order is made, the respondent must give the Police any firearms licence they hold and any weapons they have. Weapons means any firearm, airgun, pistol, restricted weapon, ammunition or explosive. If the Protection Order is made final, the respondent’s firearms licence will be cancelled. 7 Can I stay in...

7. BI v ID [2024] NZDT 806 (13 September 2024) [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...u-turn and parked across the road on [Street], in a service lane driveway. BI followed ID and parked behind him, and in his state he opened his door, and a bus came past and crippled his passenger door. It is not disputed that ID held a learner’s licence at the time of the collision, was driving his father’s vehicle unsupervised, and according to BI, ID did not have L plates visible at the time of the collision. Although initially responsive, BI said that he only had ID’s contac...

8. O'Connor & Anor v CAC 20004 & Randall [2013] NZREADT 104 [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...non-publication order pursuant to s.108(1) of the 2008 Act. It is acknowledged that the Committee found that there was no requirement for publication. However, the Act requires the Registrar of the Authority to maintain a public register of those holding licences under the Act, providing (inter alia) information about any action taken on a disciplinary matter in respect of a licensee in the past three years – refer ss.63-66 of the Act. The effect of these provisions is that a Complai...

9. REAA CAC 10017 v Miller [2014] NZREADT 70 [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...s.172 of the 2008 Act applies. Given that s.172 allows us to impose only penalties that would have been available under the Real Estate Agents Act 1976, the penalty options available to us are limited to cancellation or suspension of Mr Miller’s licence and/or a financial penalty of no more than $750. [3] If we consider imposing orders for cancellation or suspension under s.172 of the 2008 Act, we are required to consider the “character test” applicable under the 1976 2...

10. Whaanga v Trustees of the - Anewa Trust Anewa Block [2013] Māori Appellate Court MB 45 (2013 APPEAL 45) [pdf, 161 KB]

    ...necessary – the Trustees do not have to prove that current management and use of the land is the most appropriate use. c) There are reasonable alternatives to partition, including an occupation order for the whole or part of the land, and/or licences to occupy or graze the land within the reservation area. d) The appellant has never put her proposals for use of the land to the Trustees except as part of a partition proposal. The Trustees’ opposition to the partition applicat...