Search Results

1. Auckland Standards Committee v Witehira [2012] NZLCDT 5 [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...the practice. Those undertakings included Mr Witehira agreeing that he would not exercise any control over the practice’s trust account, not open a new trust account, not deal with any client funds, and that he would relinquish his e-dealing licence and any digital certificates. He also acknowledged that he would take all steps necessary to facilitate the operation of his practice through his practice attorney. [16] After its enquiry was completed, the Standards Committee determ...

2. Sisley & Anor v CAC 301 & Anor [2014] NZREADT 89 [pdf, 65 KB]

   ...Committee may direct publication of its decisions under ss.80, 89, and 93 “as it considers necessary or desirable in the public interest”. [10] The Act also requires the Registrar of the Authority to maintain a public register of those holding licences under the Act, which provides information about any action taken on a disciplinary matter in respect of a licensee in the past three years, ss.63- 66. The effect of this is that a Complaints Assessment Committee finding of unsatisfact...

3. Tan v CAC20005 & Anor [2015] NZREADT 12 [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...Tan (“the complainant”) appeals against the penalty decision of Complaints Assessment Committee 20005 following its unsatisfactory conduct finding against Mr Redvers McCabe (“the licensee”). The latter holds a real estate salesperson’s licence and works for Western Realty Ltd which trades as Ray White Glen Eden. [2] The appellant seeks: an increased fine against the licensee; that the Committee’s censure and reprimand of the licensee be maintained; and that a compensation...

4. Casas v Navarette-Scholes [2016] NZIACDT 33 (28 June 2016) [pdf, 112 KB]

   ...to provide invoices setting out a full description of the services provided. [25] In my view, clause 8 required that Ms Navarette-Scholes set out what amounts of money her client paid and how this money was allocated. Ms Navarette-Scholes used her licence to engage with her client but elected to be paid through another person. Accordingly, the starting point was that her client was entitled to know exactly who was paid, how much they were paid, and what services were provided in exchange...

5. LS v TD LCRO 298/2012 Penalty decision (23 February 2015) [pdf, 68 KB]

   ...There is no reason however to consider the letter has not been provided by him. 4 Submissions LS to LCRO (9 February 2015). 3 an apology and by reference to the industry in which he is engaged (the building industry) submits that Mr TD’s licence to practise should be withdrawn.5 Mr JW’s submissions [10] Mr JW submits that Mr TD’s unsatisfactory conduct is at the lower end of the scale. He says that the process has been “gruelling and extremely stressful for the...

6. Prakash v Zhou [2014] NZIACDT 117 (28 November 2014) [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...any refunds payable upon completing or ceasing a contract for services. [29] The particulars identify an agreement dated 13 February 2012 that entitled Ms Prakash to a full refund which Ms Zhou failed to pay. [30] Ms Zhou accepts she was the sole licenced immigration adviser in the Practice, she is named as the licensed immigration adviser in an agreement which provides Ms Prakash would get a full refund on certain conditions. She accepts she was present when the agreement was executed...

7. Crosby v Appleton - Whangamata 4D1C1B (2008) 114 Hauraki MB 209 (114 H 209) [pdf, 2.6 MB]

   ...agree with her proposal. Her complaint arises now because somebody other than her has the legal right to occupy section 5. [40] I understand that Mrs Crosby has erected a dwelling and garage on section 6. She has asselted to the Comt that she has a licence to occupy section 6 "from the old Trust". There is no evidence in Mrs Appleton's application for an occupation order file or the rehearing file, which SUppOlts Mrs Crosby's assertion. Thus she may be in informa...

8. [2016] NZEmpC 144 Rossiter v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 123 KB]

   ...significant part, reply to the plaintiff’s submissions made on 1 November 2016 and the matters at issue, even on this preliminary question, are of such significance that the parties should be heard fully on them. That should not be taken as a licence to ignore timetabled directions and not to seek a variation to them where the interests of justice may so require. [4] Mr Rossiter says that at the end of the off-season at AFFCO’s Wairoa plant, he was offered work for the forthcom...

9. Fenton - Rūrima Māori Reservation (2004) 102 Whakatāne 196 (102 WHK 196) [pdf, 851 KB]

   ...enjoyment as beneficial ovvners are suspended. The legal estate vests in the reservation trustees while the original owners and their successors retain the beneficial estate. As long as the reservation status exists, the reservation trustees possess a licence as to occupation, use and enjoyment of the land and the benefits accruing therefrom until the reservation is cancelled: (see Re Mt Tauhara Maori Reservation; Re Rahui A13 Block (1992) 32 Gisborne MB 370; and Re Ruawahia 2B (1992) 6W...

10. TB v KP LCRO 174/2016 [pdf, 167 KB]

    ...that: (a) MY was an Australian qualified lawyer admitted in Australia on [Date]. (b) He was an employee of KP Lawyers from [Date] until April 2016. (c) When the caveat was lodged, he held the requisite Land Information New Zealand Landonline licence to do that and had done so after discussion with Mr KP by whom he was supervised.6 5 At [1.1]. 6 (d) The caveat was lodged before Mr FC became an employee of KP Lawyers and he had...