Search Results

1. MLC 2019 October National Pānui [pdf, 383 KB]

   Contents: Applications for hearing in OCTOBER | WHIRINGA-Ä-NUKU 2019: ISSN 1175 - 8120 (Print) ISSN 2463-3763 (Online) www.mäorilandcourt.govt.nz www.mäorilandonline.govt.nz OCTOBER | WHIRINGA-Ä-NUKU 2019 The purpose of the National Pänui / Te Pänui ä Motu is to provide notice to interested parties of hearings being conducted in, and applications received by, the Mäori Land Court. Only applications and sittings that were confi rmed at the time of this publication are listed. F

2. Māori Land Court Panui October 2021 pdf [pdf, 399 KB]

   ...Benefi ciaries A20210009293 113A/93, 118(6)/93 Murray John Richardson Theo June Richardson - Succession Additional Interests A20210009280 150A/93 Hinerau Unaku Te Mihi Kore Paenga Tikitiki X Nos 44, 46, 47 and 67 Ahu Whenua Trust - Noting of Licence to Occupy Between Trustees and Hinerau Unaku Te Mihi Kore Paenga and Roxanne Paenga A20210009583 239/93 Te Tumu Paeroa Tokomaru B5A2 - Replace Phillip Collins, Francis Collins and Frances Collins with Vivienne Walker and Angela Tuaver...

3. [2009] NZEmpC WC 8/09 New Zealand Meat Workers and related Trades Union v Taylor Preston Ltd [pdf, 64 KB]

   ...person. [43] Although s9 prohibits a preference where it is conferred because a person is or is not a member of a union, s9(2) acknowledges that mere difference in employment terms in a workplace does not make preference unlawful. Section 9(3) licences collective agreements to contain terms and conditions that recognise 4 [1999] 1 ERNZ 390 benefits. Different terms and conditions conferred on employees employed by the...

4. Gollins v CAC 20002 [2014] NZREADT 52 [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...in fact, signed on 21 September 2012. [75] Having said all that, it may be that the defendant’s admissions establish not only unsatisfactory conduct but also misconduct. Currently, we would not think that revocation, or even suspension, of licence is required or appropriate on the particular facts of this case so that the defendant might be well advised to enter a guilty plea at this stage. 14 [76] We observe that the skilled services for which Mr Gollins expected paymen...

5. CAC 20004 v Campbell [2014] NZREADT 28 [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...public, as disgraceful. Particulars: On or around 28 January 2012 the defendant removed a three-tiered stand without authority from a property managed by the defendant.” Basic Facts [4] At all relevant times, the defendant held an agent’s licence under the Act. She is a director of the Thames branch of Harcourts and deals predominantly with property management through Thames Property Management and Rentals Ltd. [5] Over 2010 until February 2013, 209b Oakley Crescent, Thames...

6. Young v ACC [2014] NZACA 7 [pdf, 57 KB]

   ...Surgeon, reviewed Ms Young’s condition on 11 October 1979 and said: “ Mrs Young is keeping house for herself and her husband. She walks around the shops with the aid of one stick after being driven there. She has actually never had a driving licence herself. She is an epileptic. Round the house she can walk without a stick but uses one stick whenever she goes outdoors. A few days before this PRESENT CONDITION: 2 examination, she had gone a whole day without any sti...

7. Morgan v ACC [2010] NZACA 10 [pdf, 80 KB]

   ...decision with regard to a historic claim where ACC had again failed to assess company vehicle etc formula was determined and accepted by the Corporation for assessing the value for ERC purposes. (1989): [a] The cost of the vehicle plus annual licence, insurance and WoF; [b] The interest rate at that time; [c] Depreciation at 20.28 percent; [d] Running costs 15,000 km at 15.5 cents per kilometre. [31] In this case we have a direct reference as to the cost to Wrightsons Limit...

8. BORA Countering Terrorist Fighters Legislation Bill [pdf, 362 KB]

   ...McGrath, Anderson JJ). [11]Hunter v Southam [1984] 2 SCR 145. [12]R v Williams [2007] NZCA 52, [2007] 3 NZLR 207 at [123]. [13]R v Ngan [2007] NZSC 105, [2008] 2 NZLR 48 at [112]. [14]Such as a commercial activity carried out under a conditional licence: see, eg, British Columbia Securities Commission v Branch [1995] 2 SCR 3; Simmons v R [1988] 2 SCR 495. [15]Section 30 Evidence Act 2006. This includes where, notwithstanding that the conditions for exercise of the warrantless power...

9. Waitangi Tribunal - issue 57 of Te Manutukutuku [pdf, 571 KB]

   ...access to mahinga kai (food gathering areas), and adjoining Mäori land. Objections were over- ruled, and all inshore space has now been allocated. Claimant Mr Chris Love maintains that: “In declining any of our applications for marine farm licences, the MDC has effectively relegated Te Atiawa to being just another interest group operating under their system of First In First “The sense of grievance that surrounds the loss from Mäori to private ownership of such a large area o...

10. Smith v Courtney - Ohuirua No 2 [2011] Māori Appellate Court MB 284 (2011 APPEAL 284) [pdf, 1 MB]

    ...as it currently applies. What may have historically occurred in the granting of an easement in relation to the Semenoff block has little weight. [41] The appellant is an owner in common in the block. Unless there is a lease, occupation order or licence in place a feature of co-ownership is unity of possession. All co-owners are equally entitled to enjoy the whole of the property. 9 Unity of possession allows the appellant to pass and re-pass over the block. Ownership in common also...