BL & UL v AX [2014] NZIACDT 9 (05 February 2014) [pdf, 84 KB]
...relating to the adviser. [2] The basis of the complaint was the adviser failed to exercise proper and adequate supervision in the course of supervising another licensed immigration adviser. The person subject to the supervision (the provisional licence holder) only held a provisional licence, so supervision was mandatory under the Act. [3] The issue arose as the complainants say they gave instructions to the provisional licence holder to lodge an appeal against Immigration New Zealand...