CAC 20006 v Azimi [2014] NZREADT 97 [pdf, 33 KB]
...was misconduct; because she either knew that their real estate activities were fraudulent or she must have inferred that.” [4] Accordingly, we found the charges proved. The Committee’s position is that the Tribunal should cancel Ms Azimi’s licence and fine her. The Purposes and Principles of Disciplinary Orders [5] McGrath J, for a majority of the Supreme Court (Blanchard, Tipping and McGrath JJ) in Z v CAC [2009] 1 NZLR 1 (at [97]), has stated: “… the purpose of statut...