Search Results

1. Complaints Assessment Committee 413 v Kumandan [2018] NZREADT 75 [pdf, 151 KB]

   ...ensure that the licensee in question does not act in a similar way in the future. 3.5 In the present case, the Committee submits that both specific and general deterrence are engaged. While Mr Kumandan has not engaged in these proceedings and his licence is voluntarily suspended, his conduct should be recorded should he seek to resume working in real estate. Additionally, a strong message should be sent to other licensees about the importance of compliance with requirements under...

2. Weber v CAC 20002 & Penrose & Brown's Real Estate [2013] NZREADT 83 [pdf, 37 KB]

   ...particulars, as Mrs Guy Kidd puts it: “i. The name of the third respondent Browns Real Estate and its trading name referred to in paragraphs 1, 15 and 24 of the decision (New Zealand Sotherby’s International Realty Limited). ii. The names of the licence holder of the third respondent, Nigel Brown, and the sales associates employed by the third respondent who gave evidence at the hearing, namely, Julian Brown and the second respondent David Penrose. Iii The fraternal relationship...

3. Cheema v Lepcha [2011] NZIACDT 16 (20 June 2011) [pdf, 89 KB]

   ...sanctions (1) The sanctions that the Tribunal may impose are — (a) caution or censure: 6 (b) a requirement to undertake specified training or otherwise remedy any deficiency within a specified period: (c) suspension of licence for the unexpired period of the licence, or until the person meets specified conditions: (d) cancellation of licence: (e) an order preventing the person from reapplying for a licence for a period not exceeding two years, or unt...

4. Appalasamy v Yap [2014] NZIACDT 16 (25 February 2014) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...51 Disciplinary sanctions (1) The sanctions that the Tribunal may impose are— (a) caution or censure: (b) a requirement to undertake specified training or otherwise remedy any deficiency within a specified period: (c) suspension of licence for the unexpired period of the licence, or until the person meets specified conditions: (d) cancellation of licence:(e) an order preventing the person from reapplying for a licence for a period not exceeding 2 years, or until the per...

5. [2020] NZIACDT 36 Y(O)R v Tian (7 August 2020) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...51 Disciplinary sanctions (1) The sanctions that the Tribunal may impose are— (a) caution or censure: (b) a requirement to undertake specified training or otherwise remedy any deficiency within a specified period: (c) suspension of licence for the unexpired period of the licence, or until the person meets specified conditions: (d) cancellation of licence: (e) an order preventing the person from reapplying for a licence for a period not exceeding 2 years, or until the...

6. [2022] NZIACDT 30 - ZK v Li (19 December 2022) [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...51 Disciplinary sanctions (1) The sanctions that the Tribunal may impose are— (a) caution or censure: (b) a requirement to undertake specified training or otherwise remedy any deficiency within a specified period: (c) suspension of licence for the unexpired period of the licence, or until the person meets specified conditions: (d) cancellation of licence: 4 Unnikrishnan v Goldsmith [2017] NZIACDT 22 at [30]–[31], NT v Parker [2019] NZIACDT 71 at [60]. 5 Immigra...

7. Zhang v Deng [2012] NZIACDT 26 (31 May 2012) [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...complaint. That material provided a basis for the following findings: [15.1] Ms Deng was engaged to assist Ms Zhang with seeking a visitor’s permit on or about 26 February 2009. Ms Deng was not then a licensed immigration adviser, she obtained a licence on 1 April 2009. [15.2] Ms Deng failed to enter into a written agreement with Ms Deng for the provision of immigration services. [15.3] Ms Deng received Ms Zhang’s passport, and was paid the sum of $1,580 as fees and disburseme...

8. Shadforth (Appeal) [2019] NZIACDT 42 (20 June 2019) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...decision against Ms Shadforth on 16 June 2016 and then a final sanctions decision on 3 August 2016.3 The sanctions reflected not just the Code breaches, but also her conduct after the Tribunal upheld the complaint on 18 May 2016. Ms Shadforth’s licence was cancelled and she was prohibited from applying for a further licence. She was also censured, ordered to pay a penalty of $7,500 and to make a contribution of $5,000 towards the Tribunal’s costs. Ms Shadforth’s complaint t...

9. [2020] NZIACDT 53 - ZG v Parker (16 December 2020) [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...Immigration New Zealand’s letter of 7 March 2018. This was a breach of cls 2(a) and 7(a) of the Code. SUBMISSIONS Submissions from the Registrar [13] In his submissions of 11 November 2020, the Registrar advises that Mr Parker has held a full licence since 16 January 2013. It is noted that a previous complaint for using unlicensed staff to communicate had been upheld by the Tribunal. As the present conduct had occurred before the earlier disciplinary proceedings, it could n...

10. LASDP Protocol 12 September 2022 [pdf, 17 KB]

    ...Pawnbrokers Protocols 1. These guidelines replace all previous Covid protocols and will apply to the Licensing Authority of Secondhand Dealers and Pawnbrokers while Covid is in the community. 2. The LASDP will process all applications for licences and certificates and deal with complaints against all licence and certificate holders in its usual manner and in accordance with statutory guidelines but with the following conditions: • In person hearings will resume but mo...