Search Results

1. DKD v Smith [2019] NZIACDT 82 (12 December 2019) [pdf, 78 KB]

   ...[3] Mr Smith has failed to respond to the complaint. BACKGROUND [4] Mr Gregory Francisco Smith was at the relevant time a licensed immigration adviser based in Auckland. He was a director of Impact Migration Services Ltd. A renewal of his licence was refused by the Registrar of Immigration Advisers (the Registrar), the head of the Authority, on 20 October 2015. [5] It is recorded that other complaints against Mr Smith, largely similar to the one made by the complainant, have...

2. [2023] NZIACDT 11 - SM v Kim (6 April 2023) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...51 Disciplinary sanctions (1) The sanctions that the Tribunal may impose are— (a) caution or censure: (b) a requirement to undertake specified training or otherwise remedy any deficiency within a specified period: (c) suspension of licence for the unexpired period of the licence, or until the person meets specified conditions: (d) cancellation of licence: (e) an order preventing the person from reapplying for a licence for a period not exceeding 2 years, or until the...

3. [2022] NZIACDT 12 - LS v Murthy (27 May 2022) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...the Tribunal may impose are— (a) caution or censure: 2 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007. 5 (b) a requirement to undertake specified training or otherwise remedy any deficiency within a specified period: (c) suspension of licence for the unexpired period of the licence, or until the person meets specified conditions: (d) cancellation of licence: (e) an order preventing the person from reapplying for a licence for a period not exceeding 2 years, or until t...

4. [2024] NZIACDT 09 – ZR v Kim (4 March 2024) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...51 Disciplinary sanctions (1) The sanctions that the Tribunal may impose are— (a) caution or censure: (b) a requirement to undertake specified training or otherwise remedy any deficiency within a specified period: (c) suspension of licence for the unexpired period of the licence, or until the person meets specified conditions: (d) cancellation of licence: (e) an order preventing the person from reapplying for a licence for a period not exceeding 2 years, or until the...

5. 2023 NZPSPLA 060 [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...Authority. This training should be a minimum of a half a day in length and cover at the minimum, de-escalation training. Should they fail to do so, that failure will be taken into account in any further application they make to renew their company licence or if they face any further complaint. 5. Mr and/or Ms Filoa is to attend business management training which includes training on managing staff and complaints against them within 12 months of this decision. Should they fail t...

6. 2023 NZPSPLA 060 [pdf, 120 KB]

   ...Authority. This training should be a minimum of a half a day in length and cover at the minimum, de-escalation training. Should they fail to do so, that failure will be taken into account in any further application they make to renew their company licence or if they face any further complaint. 5. Mr and/or Ms Filoa is to attend business management training which includes training on managing staff and complaints against them within 12 months of this decision. Should they fail to do s...

7. TN v SH [2024] NZDT 569 (5 July 2024) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...he says was so extensively damaged in the head-on collision, it is uneconomic to repair. The [vehicle] was not insured. 4. SH says his mother should not be held responsible for damage because BN was driving in breach of the terms of his learner licence. That is, BN did not have “L” plates displayed on the vehicle and was not with a supervising driver. SH says his mother suffered injuries and shock as a result of the collision and has been receiving hospital level care since for vari...

8. ET v F Ltd & EN [2024] NZDT 562 (9 August 2024) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...negligence and vicarious liability. 7. The issues to be determined are: (a) Did EN drive negligently and cause the collision while driving F Ltd’s van? (b) If yes, is F Ltd vicariously liable? (c) Did EN have a current driver’s licence at the time of the collision? (d) Is EN entitled to a remedy from ET and, if so, is the amount he claims proved and reasonable? 1 District Court Rules 2009: S1.15 Correction of accidental slip or omission CI0301_CIV_D...

9. Yerbury-Wilson v Standing [2012] NZIACDT 51 (30 August 2012) [pdf, 137 KB]

   ...depends on their business being profitable or “clearly [having] the potential to be trading profitably within 12 months after the application is made”. They are concerned about the implications for them and their family. [17] Mr Standing had his licence cancelled by this Tribunal on 15 August 2011. Ms Yerbury-Wilson and Mr Wilson sought a refund of fees, including fees of $2,800 (it appears it should be £2,800 as Mr Standing’s invoice was for that amount, and that figure will be...

10. Chowdhury v Standing [2012] NZIACDT 57 (30 August 2012) [pdf, 133 KB]

    ...progressing Mr Chowdhury’s immigration objectives. [24] On 17 August 2011, Mr Standing wrote to Mr Chowdhury in a standard letter which appears to have been sent to his clients generally, as it was not personalised. It said Mr Standing had his licence cancelled by this Tribunal on 15 August 2011, and Living New Zealand Ltd (the company through which Mr Standing apparently operated his practice) had gone into liquidation. The letter suggested Mr Standing would continue to provide immig...