Search Results

1. Waitangi Tribunal Vol 2 Kāhui Maunga Report [pdf, 12 MB]

   t e K ā h u i M a u n g a Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz t e K ā h u i M a u n g a The National Park District Inquiry Report Volume 2 Waitangi Tribunal Report 2013 Wai 1130 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz National Library of New Zealand Catalo

2. Regulatory Impact Statement: Amendments to the Sentencing Act 2002 [pdf, 1 MB]

   ...to remorse, judges already take into account prior offending as an aggravating factor at sentencing. Preventing its repeat application may only serve to disincentivise offenders from taking steps to engage with the harm they have caused, including through restorative justice, which can be of great benefit to victims. Regulatory Impact Statement | 3 For the proposal to limit sentence discounts to 40 per cent the Ministry of Justice’s preferred option is retaining the statu...

3. [2019] NZEnvC 203 Director General of Conservation v New Zealand Transport Agency [pdf, 7.8 MB]

   ...and A Brenstrum for New Zealand Transport Agency SJ Ongley for Director-General of Conservation V Morrison-Shaw for Te Runanga o Ngati Tama R Enright and RG Haazen for Te Korowai Tiaki o Te Hauauru Incorporated D and T Pascoe for themselves through R Gibbs and M Gibbs R Gibbs and M Gibbs for Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust HP Harwood for New Plymouth District Council and Taranaki Regional Council Date of Decision: 18 December 2019 Date of Issue: INTERIM DECISION OF THE ENVI...

4. Directory of Official Information G-I [pdf, 830 KB]

   Directory of Official Information Listings G-I About This is a living document. We endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email oia@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. We can send you a MS Word version if you need. Ministerial Relations and Services Strategy, Governance & Finance Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture oia@justice.govt.nz

5. Directory of Official Information G-I [pdf, 834 KB]

   Directory of Official Information Listings G-I About This is a living document. We endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email oia@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. We can send you a MS Word version if you need. Ministerial Relations and Services Strategy, Governance & Finance Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture oia@justice.govt.nz

6. The Trustees of the Tauwhao Te Ngare Trust v Shaw - Tauwhao Te Ngare Block and a preliminary decision of the Chief Judge at 2013 CJ 567 [2014] Māori Appellate Court MB 394 (2014 APPEAL 394) [pdf, 377 KB]

   ...show the roadway as having primary title boundaries or it may show a disjoined vinculum over titles on either side of the roadway. Conversely, if it is shown as running over existing titles as per a right of way or has a joined vinculum running through it, then it is not a separate freehold title. Care should be taken in relying on sketch plans as they do not always follow the Court’s minute and are not necessarily approved by a Judge. Care should also be taken in relying on surv...

7. Restorative Justice: Best practice in New Zealand 2004 - 2017 [pdf, 428 KB]

   ...1 New Zealand Restorative Justice Trust (2000) New Zealand Restorative Justice Practice Manual, pg. 13 . Further discussion of the values, outcomes, and objectives of restorative justice is provided throughout this publication. 2 Zehr, H. (2002) The Little Book of Restorative Justice. Good Books, Intercourse, PA, pg. 5. 3 Zehr, H. (2002) The Little Book of Restorative Justice. Good Books, Intercourse, PA, pg. 37. 4 Morris, A. (2002) Critiq

8. [2017] NZEnvC 184 Cabra Rural Developments Ltd v Auckland Council [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...there clear jurisdictional issues? [10] The conclusion of the Court, having heard this matter for the day, is that the question of the actual jurisdiction of the Council in respect of the IHP is somewhat more complex than has been addressed simply through submissions of counsel. Although some of the various submissions on which the Council's position was based were covered by counsel, there are many others, and we are told that it is the overall effect of those submissions that...

9. Ellis — Matapihi No 1 B No 2C No 2D (2010) 2010 Chief Judge’s MB 25 (2010 CJ 25) [pdf, 124 KB]

   ...were safe. He did not advise her that he intended to transfer the shares to his son. She did not become aware of the transfer until 1997 when a family member told her that Ratahi Ellis was building on the block. Christina Ellis pursued the matter through her lawyers, initially making application to determine her interest in the now partitioned block, called Matapihi 8A. However, because the land was General land the Māori Land Court had no jurisdiction and she withdrew the applicatio...

10. Warin - Whangaruru Whakaturia 4 Lot 32 DP 126453 (Part) 30 Taitokerau MB 37 (30 TTK 37) [pdf, 250 KB]

    ...Māori freehold land. [16] In answer to a question from me, Mr Jensen clarified that in fact they had not made any application for finance and that it was Mr and Mrs Warin’s broker who had said that it would be very very difficult, at least through normal financing sources. I note that evidence was not presented from Mr and Mrs Warin’s broker or from any banks and that, while Mr Jensen is a Rural Farm Manager with Rabobank and has a Diploma in Farm Management and Valuation, h...