Search Results

1. Waitangi Tribunal Part 1 Report on stage 1 of the Te Paparahi o Te Raki inquiry [pdf, 6.1 MB]

   H e W H a k a p u t a n g a m e t e t i r i t i t H e D e c l a r a t i o n a n D t H e t r e a t y He Whakaputanga me te Tiriti The Declaration and the Treaty Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz W A I T A N G I T R I B U N A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 4 W A I 1 0 4 0 The Report on Stage 1 of the

2. [2013] NZEmpC 1 Gini v Literacy Training Ltd [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...both jobs at the same time. [27] Ms Gini said in cross-examination that she had taken the Sadlers position as “a hedge” because she could see what was happening. She said: “I wouldn’t have applied to Sadlers if I hadn’t been hauled through the disciplinary meeting etc.” That explanation, however, seems to overlook the fact that the email from Sadlers confirming her employment was dated 7 September 2009 whereas the disciplinary meeting Ms Gini referred to did not tak...

3. [2021] NZIACDT 26 - RH v Ji - Sanctions (23 December 2021) [pdf, 277 KB]

   ...deceive clients, the Registrar and the Tribunal. There is no repentance. The Tribunal should safeguard the public interest. She does not want anyone to be the next victim of Mr Ji. [21] The complainant demands a refund of the $2,000 paid to Mr Ji through [Company]. In addition, she demands compensation: Legal fees $9,372.50 Further legal fees $625.03 6 Labour costs $5,670.00 Lost wages $45,745.00 Lost reputation/credibility with Immigration NZ $5,000.00 [22] An...

4. [2024] NZEnvC 072 McCallum Bros Limited v Manuhiri Kaitiaki Charitable Trust [pdf, 7.2 MB]

   ...“cultural effects”. 3 sought to extend the area of extraction to allow extraction between the 30 and 40- metre isobaths within specified areas. It is important to note the Kaipara Limited was not substituted by McCallum Bros until part way through the Council hearing in 2021. [6] The submission on the matter filed for MKCT is annexed hereto and marked “A”. We include the entire original submission, given its importance to the matters the subject of the strike out applic...

5. Wilson - Oue 2B 2C [2025] Chief Judge's MB 169 (2025 CJ 169) [pdf, 495 KB]

   ...decision due to a flaw in the evidence presented, or in the interpretation of the law, and it is necessary in the interests of justice to correct its record. For this reason, s 45 applications must be accompanied by proof of the flaw identified, either through the production of 4 Ashwell – Rawinia or Lavinia Ashwell (nee Russell) [2009] Chief Judge’s MB 209 (2009 CJ 209) at [15]. 2025 Chief Judge's MB 183 evidence not available or not known of at the time the order w...

6. Common Bundle Volume 5 [pdf, 14 MB]

   18 March 2020 Regional Plan: Water for Otago Proposed Plan Change 7 (Water Permits) CB1363 ii Proposed Plan Change 7 (Water Permits) to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago 18 March 2020 CB1364 Proposed Plan Change 7 (Water Permits) to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago 18 March 2020 iii Introduction The Otago Regional Council has prepared Proposed Plan Change 7 to

7. [2021] NZEmpC 8 Commissioner of Police v New Zealand Police Assoc Inc [pdf, 464 KB]

   COMMISSIONER OF POLICE v NEW ZEALAND POLICE ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED [2021] NZEmpC 8 [11 February 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZEmpC 8 EMPC 339/2019 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN COMMISSIONER OF POLICE Plaintiff AND NEW ZEALAND POLICE ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED Defendant

8. Independent Electoral Review Final Report Executive Summary and List of Recommendations [pdf, 655 KB]

   Final Report Our recommendations for a fairer, clearer, and more accessible electoral system November 2023 He Arotake Pōtitanga Motuhake Independent Electoral Review Final Report | Executive Summary 13 He Arotake Pōtitanga Motuhake Independent Electoral Review Executive Summary Background 1. We were established as an independent panel in May 2022 by the Minister of Justice to review Aotearoa New Zealand’s electoral system. Our Terms of Reference cover

9. Regulatory Impact Statement: Amendments to the Sentencing Act 2002 [pdf, 1 MB]

   ...to remorse, judges already take into account prior offending as an aggravating factor at sentencing. Preventing its repeat application may only serve to disincentivise offenders from taking steps to engage with the harm they have caused, including through restorative justice, which can be of great benefit to victims. Regulatory Impact Statement | 3 For the proposal to limit sentence discounts to 40 per cent the Ministry of Justice’s preferred option is retaining the statu...

10. Waitangi Tribunal Vol 2 Kāhui Maunga Report [pdf, 12 MB]

    t e K ā h u i M a u n g a Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz t e K ā h u i M a u n g a The National Park District Inquiry Report Volume 2 Waitangi Tribunal Report 2013 Wai 1130 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz National Library of New Zealand Catalo