LCRO 45/2020 MN v RK (22 December 2020) [pdf, 249 KB]
...property in issue for the ultimate beneficiaries”. [52] This, in my view, mischaracterises the nature of what was an entirely conventional set of instructions. 7 Mr MN’s correspondence (3 March 2020) at p4. 11 [53] Mr GS and Ms RK were separated. [54] They had formalised the division of relationship property in a relationship property agreement [55] Both had engaged their own lawyers. [56] As is not uncommon in such cases, they had decided that a lawyer independent...