Search Results

1. [2018] NZEnvC 214 King v Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga [pdf, 13 MB]

   ...Iwi Tribal Authority is one of two (together with Te Kawerau Iwi Settlement Trust) representative bodies of Te Kawerau a Maki. The rohe of Te Kawerau a Maki extends from South Auckland and the Tamaki River northwards across the Tamaki isthmus, through Hikurangi (West Auckland) and the lands around the upper Waitemata Harbour and North Shore and into the Kaipara and Mahurangi harbour areas. They are the northern-most iwi of the Tainui waka. They lived for generations at Puketapapa, b...

2. 14.02.2023 Long Term Insights Briefing The Future of Imprisonment II FINAL [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   Research New Zealand 1 Long-term Insights Briefing The Future of Imprisonment in New Zealand II Final Report October 2022 Research New Zealand 2 Long-term Insights Briefing The Future of Imprisonment in New Zealand II PREPARED FOR Rebecca Lancashire Ministry of Justice PREPARED BY Emanuel Kalafatelis, Annita Wood and Jane Falloon CONTACT DETAILS Emanuel Kalafatelis Research New Zealand Phone 04 499 3088 www.researchnz.

3. ENVC Matiatia party corresp WMLFeb15 affidavit M Dunn [pdf, 17 MB]

   ...along with another property (Lot 51 DP159304) to the south, in a freehold title (NA 129A!130) by the Council. There are a few memorials recorded against the property title. 12. An electricity easement crosses part of Lot 8. It appears to pass through the eastem end of Option 3 car park area. This matter would require further investigation and be taken into account in the final deSign of the Option 3 proposal. 13. Also I note from the aerial photograph what appears to be a walking...

4. ENVC Matiatia party correspondence - WML Feb15 - affidavit M Dunn [pdf, 17 MB]

   ...along with another property (Lot 51 DP159304) to the south, in a freehold title (NA 129A!130) by the Council. There are a few memorials recorded against the property title. 12. An electricity easement crosses part of Lot 8. It appears to pass through the eastem end of Option 3 car park area. This matter would require further investigation and be taken into account in the final deSign of the Option 3 proposal. 13. Also I note from the aerial photograph what appears to be a walking...

5. NZ Law Commission review of the law of Trusts [pdf, 2.4 MB]

   REVIEW OF THE LAW OF TRUSTS November 2010, Wellington, New Zealand | R E P O R T 1 1 9 A TRUSTS ACT FOR NEW ZEALAND August 2013, Wellington, New Zealand | R E P O R T 1 3 0 E31(130) August 2013, Wellington, New Zealand | REPORT 130 REVIEW OF THE LAW OF TRUSTS A TRUSTS ACT FOR NEW ZEALAND The Law Commission is an independent, publicly funded, central advisory body established by statute to undertake the systematic review, reform and development of the law of New Zealand

6. NZ Private Prosecution Service Ltd v Key (Strike-Out Application) [2015] NZHRRT 48 [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...grounds: [4.1] The facts contained in the statement of claim, if proven, do not establish an arguable case. [4.2] The proceedings are vexatious or an abuse of process. [4.3] The proceedings have not been brought in good faith. [5] In turn, NZPPSL (through Mr McCready) alleges: [5.1] The Chairperson of the Tribunal is disqualified by reason of bias from participating in the decision on the strike-out application. [5.2] The solicitor on the record for the defendant (Mr PT Kiely) is...

7. Donnelly v Tuala Rongohaere Marae (2007) 78 Ruatoria MB 55 (78 RUA 55) [pdf, 267 KB]

   ...other point about that is that there seemed to be a denial right up until the last minute, and then counsel for the respondents finally came forward at questioning to Malcolm Thomas… if this was a genuine case why wasn’t this raised anytime through that six months, and why did it not appear in the minutes. Throughout the minutes he said that was his signature and he signed it. In the minutes of October, November, Ngaire Keelan does put the question to him. So did Gary Walker...

8. LCRO 45/2020 MN v RK (22 December 2020) [pdf, 249 KB]

   ...property in issue for the ultimate beneficiaries”. [52] This, in my view, mischaracterises the nature of what was an entirely conventional set of instructions. 7 Mr MN’s correspondence (3 March 2020) at p4. 11 [53] Mr GS and Ms RK were separated. [54] They had formalised the division of relationship property in a relationship property agreement [55] Both had engaged their own lawyers. [56] As is not uncommon in such cases, they had decided that a lawyer independent...

9. Tamplin v Boizard [2021] NZHRRT 42 [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...without fear that their confidential information may be divulged if they complain. [57.7] It would be truly ironic if a Code that is designed to protect a person’s right to privacy of health information resulted in an increased breach of privacy through dissemination of the same. [58] Dr Boizard neither supports nor opposes these applications. However, it was suggested by his counsel that the Tribunal may wish of its own motion to refer to Dr Boizard as “Dr B”. Interim non-pub...

10. [2017] NZEnvC 200 Morningstar Development Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 1.5 MB]

    ...accordance with conditions 11, 15 and 16 (or the other similar conditions). Morningstar also subsequently sought a section 224(c) certificate, even though they had not undertaken any steps to comply with those conditions. Subsequently, Morningstar through their director, Mr Morgenstern and his wife, signed Bonds, including those for the maintenance under conditions 16 and their equivalents under the other consents. For current purposes, we attach the Bond relating to consent 40735 as...