Search Results

1. [2019] NZEnvC 049 Haines House Haulage Northland v Whangarei District Council [pdf, 3.5 MB]

   jSEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Court: IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC 4 '1 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act HAINES HOUSE HAULAGE NORTHLAND LIMITED (ENV-2018-AKL-12S) Appellant WHANGAREI DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge J A Smith Environment Commissioner R M Dunlop Environment Commissioner S K Prime Hearing: Whangarei, 10-12 December 2018, incl

2. NZCASS: the experience of e-crime findings from the 2006 survey [pdf, 230 KB]

   THE EXPERIENCE OF E–CRIME FINDINGS FROM THE NEW ZEALAND CRIME & SAFETY SURVEY 2006 This research was commissioned by the Research, Evaluation and Modelling Unit of the Ministry of Justice. The report has been prepared by the authors and the views expressed in it are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Ministry. Published in December 2007 by the Ministry of Justice, PO Box 180, Wellington, New Zealand © Crown Copyright ISBN 978-0-478-29042-X

3. [2018] NZEmpC 9 Lyttelton Port Co Ltd v Arthurs [pdf, 297 KB]

   ...company at the port since 1992. He comes from a family of waterside workers, his father worked for LPC, and his brother, Glen Arthurs, is currently employed by LPC. Mr Arthurs’ parents and brother have been very supportive and protective of him throughout this difficult period; much of the relevant correspondence has been sent from the “Arthurs whanau”. That correspondence has been prepared in consultation with Mr Arthurs, and with his agreement, but sent by his brother and...

4. Chand and Kumari v Prakash [2012] NZIACDT 85 (3 December 2012) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...have a written agreement, and withholding the passport, and concluded it was withheld as leverage in order to make Mr Chand pay fees. Submissions from Mr Prakash on Penalty [3] Mr Prakash provided submissions on the sanctions that may be imposed through his counsel Mr Laurent. [4] Key elements in the submissions as to the circumstances were that Mr Prakash: [4.1] Has always accepted that he did not have a written agreement for the additional work he performed. [4.2] Now accepts th...

5. NZCVS Methodology Report Cycle 3 (2020) [pdf, 4.9 MB]

   Methodology Report Cycle 3 (2019/20) ISSN 2744-5798 Published in June 2021 By The Ministry of Justice Justice Centre, 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088, Wellington, New Zealand T: +64 4 918 8800 F: +64 4 918 8820 E: NZCVS@justice.govt.nz W: www.justice.govt.nz/justice-sector-policy/research-data/nzcvs Suggested citation Ministry of Justice. 2021. New Zeala

6. Pou - Eru Moka and Te Owai Pou Whanau Trust (2013) 61 Taitokerau MB 247 (61 TTK 247) [pdf, 258 KB]

   ...and Te Owai Pou. They had 10 children: seven sons and three daughters. Only four sons (Alfred, Arama, Archie and Te Rautau (the applicant)) and a daughter (Hinewaka) are still alive. They are all now aged in their 80s or thereabouts. I refer throughout this judgment to the descendants of Eru and Te Owai Pou as “the whānau”. 1 See the discussion in Ruapuha and Uekaha Hapu Trust v Norman Tane – Hauturu East 8 Block (2010) 20...

7. [2021] NZEnvC 165 Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust v Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Toanga [pdf, 554 KB]

   ...following litigation in 2008-2009. In broad terms, the way that arrangement had worked in the past meant that Poutama/Te Ahuru expected that they would be closely involved from the outset in the planning and execution of a project such as this. It is through this active engagement and monitoring of the works that Poutama/Te Ahuru believe their cultural interests can be best protected, and possibly the need for an authority avoided altogether. We were directed to various sources...

8. [2021] NZEnvC 165 Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust v Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Toanga [pdf, 554 KB]

   ...following litigation in 2008-2009. In broad terms, the way that arrangement had worked in the past meant that Poutama/Te Ahuru expected that they would be closely involved from the outset in the planning and execution of a project such as this. It is through this active engagement and monitoring of the works that Poutama/Te Ahuru believe their cultural interests can be best protected, and possibly the need for an authority avoided altogether. We were directed to various sources...

9. Preece v Hokotehi Moriori Trust (2010) 5 Te Waipounamu MB 83 (5 TWP 83) [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...memorandum of counsel outlining background matters to the dispute. He indicated that at that stage his client would abide the decision of the Court.1 [11] Counsel for HMT pointed out that there were a number of descendants of Ngahiwi Dix living throughout New Zealand who had not been served with a notice of the application or hearing and who may wish to give evidence or make submissions should the matter proceed to a hearing. [12] Unfortunately that memorandum was not put before...

10. [2016] NZEmpC 37 Zespri International Limited v Yu third Interlocutory [pdf, 100 KB]

    ...privileged documents, which should be incorporated with those described above, is set out at para 11 of the defendant’s memorandum of submissions to the Court dated 16 March 2016. I will not set these out but the single list compiled from these two separate lists will be available to Mr Spence through the Registrar. There need be no differentiation at this stage between the categories in the 16 March list relating to “joint privilege” and “sole privilege”. [19]...