Search Results

1. HIJ v RST and UVW (Publication) [2013] NZHRRT 41 [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...married in 1999 was formerly a boyfriend of the plaintiff. She and her husband, along with the plaintiff and D1, shared a house (with separate bedrooms) for a short while and the two couples frequently socialised together. D2’s marriage ended in a separation on 14 March 2007. [9] After the plaintiff and D1 separated in mid 2007, D1 and D2 later entered into a relationship. This was towards the end of 2007 and they began living together in 2008. The witnesses heard by the Tribunal...

2. LQ Burgess 28 June 2014 NZSHD 9 [pdf, 44 KB]

   ...question which asked about her business partner’s name. Nor did she provide any details at all about her husband Robin Burgess in the application. [45] The purpose of the Act (s.3) is to make it harder for criminals to dispose of stolen goods through secondhand dealers and pawnbrokers and to make it easier for the police to recover stolen goods and solve property crimes. [46] The applicant and her husband both have a number of convictions for Receiving and various breaches of the...

3. [2018] NZEmpC 9 Lyttelton Port Co Ltd v Arthurs [pdf, 297 KB]

   ...company at the port since 1992. He comes from a family of waterside workers, his father worked for LPC, and his brother, Glen Arthurs, is currently employed by LPC. Mr Arthurs’ parents and brother have been very supportive and protective of him throughout this difficult period; much of the relevant correspondence has been sent from the “Arthurs whanau”. That correspondence has been prepared in consultation with Mr Arthurs, and with his agreement, but sent by his brother and...

4. Chand and Kumari v Prakash [2012] NZIACDT 85 (3 December 2012) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...have a written agreement, and withholding the passport, and concluded it was withheld as leverage in order to make Mr Chand pay fees. Submissions from Mr Prakash on Penalty [3] Mr Prakash provided submissions on the sanctions that may be imposed through his counsel Mr Laurent. [4] Key elements in the submissions as to the circumstances were that Mr Prakash: [4.1] Has always accepted that he did not have a written agreement for the additional work he performed. [4.2] Now accepts th...

5. [2019] NZEnvC 049 Haines House Haulage Northland v Whangarei District Council [pdf, 3.5 MB]

   jSEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Court: IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC 4 '1 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act HAINES HOUSE HAULAGE NORTHLAND LIMITED (ENV-2018-AKL-12S) Appellant WHANGAREI DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge J A Smith Environment Commissioner R M Dunlop Environment Commissioner S K Prime Hearing: Whangarei, 10-12 December 2018, incl

6. NZCASS: the experience of e-crime findings from the 2006 survey [pdf, 230 KB]

   THE EXPERIENCE OF E–CRIME FINDINGS FROM THE NEW ZEALAND CRIME & SAFETY SURVEY 2006 This research was commissioned by the Research, Evaluation and Modelling Unit of the Ministry of Justice. The report has been prepared by the authors and the views expressed in it are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Ministry. Published in December 2007 by the Ministry of Justice, PO Box 180, Wellington, New Zealand © Crown Copyright ISBN 978-0-478-29042-X

7. NZCVS Methodology Report Cycle 3 (2020) [pdf, 4.9 MB]

   Methodology Report Cycle 3 (2019/20) ISSN 2744-5798 Published in June 2021 By The Ministry of Justice Justice Centre, 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088, Wellington, New Zealand T: +64 4 918 8800 F: +64 4 918 8820 E: NZCVS@justice.govt.nz W: www.justice.govt.nz/justice-sector-policy/research-data/nzcvs Suggested citation Ministry of Justice. 2021. New Zeala

8. Pou - Eru Moka and Te Owai Pou Whanau Trust (2013) 61 Taitokerau MB 247 (61 TTK 247) [pdf, 258 KB]

   ...and Te Owai Pou. They had 10 children: seven sons and three daughters. Only four sons (Alfred, Arama, Archie and Te Rautau (the applicant)) and a daughter (Hinewaka) are still alive. They are all now aged in their 80s or thereabouts. I refer throughout this judgment to the descendants of Eru and Te Owai Pou as “the whānau”. 1 See the discussion in Ruapuha and Uekaha Hapu Trust v Norman Tane – Hauturu East 8 Block (2010) 20...

9. [2021] NZEnvC 165 Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust v Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Toanga [pdf, 554 KB]

   ...following litigation in 2008-2009. In broad terms, the way that arrangement had worked in the past meant that Poutama/Te Ahuru expected that they would be closely involved from the outset in the planning and execution of a project such as this. It is through this active engagement and monitoring of the works that Poutama/Te Ahuru believe their cultural interests can be best protected, and possibly the need for an authority avoided altogether. We were directed to various sources...

10. [2021] NZEnvC 165 Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust v Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Toanga [pdf, 554 KB]

    ...following litigation in 2008-2009. In broad terms, the way that arrangement had worked in the past meant that Poutama/Te Ahuru expected that they would be closely involved from the outset in the planning and execution of a project such as this. It is through this active engagement and monitoring of the works that Poutama/Te Ahuru believe their cultural interests can be best protected, and possibly the need for an authority avoided altogether. We were directed to various sources...