Search Results

1. [2016] NZEmpC 67 Bay of Plenty DHB v Rahiri [pdf, 143 KB]

   ...required. Casual employees can not be used to replace genuine permanent or temporary situations except to meet business requirements when no other alternative is available. Nothing in this definition shall preclude casual employees from moving through the pay scale in this agreement or accessing the provisions of PDRP Allowances where they have obtained and continue to maintain their competency as per Nursing Council requirements. [32] The words “Employee” and “Employer” w...

2. Gray v Paikea - Otara 5D2 (2022) 252 Taitokerau MB 210 (252 TTK 210) [pdf, 231 KB]

   ...treatment of his partner by the whānau. These are relationship issues between whānau members including the parties, that will not be resolved by this decision. I highly encourage the whānau to seek assistance in resolving the relationship issues through the mediation services available through this Court. [29] As to the issue raised concerning the change of signatories with the bank, I do not find that Mr Paikea has acted in breach of duty. The evidence is that he was willing to si...

3. [2018] NZEnvC 238 Fitzgerald v Kaikoura District Council [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   ...any culvert, bridge or kerbing. Vehicle access is the area of land where is a site or multiple sites without road frontage gain access to a legal road - commonly referred to as a right of way. Water Supply 11. The Consent Holder shall provide a separate water connection to Kaikoura's urban water supply to Lot 2. Lot 2 shall have a new Acuflo water connection at the road boundary on Hastings Street unless approved otherwise. 12. Prior to construction the consent holder shall su...

4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights - summary record 3rd report (continued) [pdf, 40 KB]

   ...individually reassessed towards the end /... CCPR/C/SR.1394 English Page 7 of their sentences by a district prisons board or the parole board, which imposed special post-release conditions aimed at protecting others or at rehabilitating the prisoner through placement in special programmes. 26. As concerned section II (f), the Penal Institutions Amendment Bill had indeed been enacted on 1 March 1995. Section 41 (e) of the new Act provided that actions performed by penal and security staff...

5. KB v JR LCRO 246/2012 (20 May 2014) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...remains dissatisfied with the answers provided. When discharging the functions of an Executor or Trustee, the Respondent was acting in that capacity, and not as a solicitor. In general terms, therefore, the Applicant needs to pursue her claims through the Court. In this regard, the provisions of s 138(1)(f) of the Act apply. That section provides that the Committee may exercise a discretion to take no further action if, in all the circumstances, there is an adequate remedy that it...

6. NZCVS 2023 Cycle 6 Perceptions of safety [xlsx, 99 KB]

   Contents NZCVS Data Tables 2023 (Cycle 6) Perceptions of safety Data tables Sheets Description 1 Changes in perceptions of safety 1 Perceptions of safety over time 2 Perception of safety and vicitmisation 2 Prevalence and incidence rates, by perception of safety 3 Perception of safety, by demographic groups 3 Perceptions of safety, by demographics About About the data tables Disclaimer 1.    While all care and diligence has been taken in processing, analysing, and extracting

7. Guide-5-A-Guide-to-Deportation-Appeal-Cancelled-Refugee-and-Protected-Person.pdf [pdf, 371 KB]

   ...https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2003/0129/latest/DLM237120.html?search=ad_act__holiday____25_ac%40bn%40rn%40dn%40apub%40aloc%40apri%40apro%40aimp%40bgov%40bloc%40bpri%40bmem%40rpub%40rimp_ac%40ainf%40anif%40bcur%40rinf%40rnif_a_aw_se_&p=1#DLM237120 Page 12 Part 3: What happens during the appeal? An appeal to the Tribunal goes through five stages: 1. Receiving the appeal 2. Preparation 3. Hearing 4. Making the decision 5. After the decision 3.1 Receivin...

8. Paul v Doorbar - Pukepapa 3 (2020) 414 Aotea MB 16 (414 AOT 16) [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...will, subject to the approval of the Māori Land Court, be appointed as a trustee of the marae reservation. Regarding the 2017 election, the respondents submitted that the AGM, where nominees were elected for the marae reservation, was advertised through Facebook and emails. Moreover, the respondents also say that Ms Paul was notified by email and she replied submitting her apologies. Mr Doorbar then claimed that Ms Paul has failed to attend any beneficiary meetings in the last 30...

9. Solomon v Johnson - Te Mata E3 Block (2017) 139 Waikato Maniapoto MB 240 (139 WMN 240) [pdf, 508 KB]

   ...June 2010, seeking a meeting between the parties. Craig stated in the email that “…Uncle Hector Tukued (sic) us a portion of land here on the block [Te Mata E3]…” 10 The meeting was for the purpose of Mr Majurey assisting them to work through the task of “creating an Ahu whenua trust or similar for the block with a management plan, occupation order and partition orders”. Paul Majurey confirmed to the applicants’ lawyer in an email dated 15 March 2016 that a meetin...

10. LCRO 121/2023 AI v HR (12 December 2023) [pdf, 218 KB]

    ...liabilities. The assets included three properties owned by various family trusts, shares also owned by a family trust in a 2 company in which both the applicant and his former wife worked, vehicles, a launch, chattels and cash. [4] The liabilities, through the trusts, included money owing to a bank and money owing to the wife’s parents’ family trust. The company also had liabilities. [5] The wife was the sole trustee of the three family trusts. The applicant was a discreti...