Search Results

1. Naera v Fenwick - Whakapoungakau 24 Block (2011) 34 Waiariki MB 151 (34 WAR 151) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...submitted that the resolutions were purportedly passed in the knowledge that an injunction had been sought and this shows a lack of respect for the Court and a lack of good faith with the owners, which is consistent with the trustees’ behaviour throughout these proceedings. Failure to obtain independent advice [24] In accordance with the Court’s earlier directions the Respondents were ordered to obtain independent advice. They received advice from Price Waterhouse Coopers (...

2. Tatai v Woodman - Waimahana D No3B Section 1 (2024) 282 Taitokerau MB 106 (282 TTK 106) [pdf, 318 KB]

   ...should be granted. He aha te kaupapa o ngā tono? What are these applications about? [2] D3B1 was created by a partition order granted on 25 February 1919.1 It was vested in four owners Hone Petera, Hoto Petera, Kere Petera and Mikahere. Through various succession and vesting orders D3B1 now has 121 owners who hold shares as tenants in common. There is no administration structure in place. [3] Most of D3B1 is undeveloped. It contains some housing. In the north-east corner...

3. Proactive release - 2020 Cannabis Referendum [pdf, 4.2 MB]

   ...model being developed and allow other political parties a chance to input into the process [CAB-18-MIN-0641.02 refers]. 11. Cabinet also agreed to an iterative process to meet these timeframes, whereby SWC will make decisions on any regulatory model through short-form Cabinet papers and oral items between now and April 2019. The final agreed approach to the referendum will then be considered by Cabinet [CAB-18-MIN-0641.02 refers]. 12. Decisions now need to be made on the content of the questi...

4. Waitangi Tribunal - District 13 Part 2 Northern South Island [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   RA N G A H A U A WH A N U I DI S T R I C T 13 THE NORTHERN SOUTH ISLAND DR G A PHILLIPSON PA R T I I OC T O B E R 1996 WO R K I N G PA P E R : FI R S T RE L E A S E WAITANGI TRIBUNAL RANGAHAUA WHANUI SERIES Other reports in the Rangahaua Whanui Series available: District 1: Auckland, R Daamen, P Hamer, and B Rigby District 7: The Volcanic Plateau, B J Bargh District 9: The Whanganui District, S Cross and B Bargh District 11a: Wairarapa, P Goldsmith District 11b: Hawke’s Bay, D Cowi

5. Kendal v Sherbourne LCRO 69 / 2009 (19 August 2009) [pdf, 57 KB]

   ...conflict of interest between the practitioner on the one hand and an existing or prospective client on the other hand. The rule is expanded on in the commentary which at paragraph 6 provides that: The rule will usually apply to any interest or dealing through the practitioner’s family or relatives or any company, trust, partnership, or other body in which the practitioner has or exerts a material measure of control or influence. It will also include interests, which are not person...

6. Evaluation of Family Safety Teams pilot: stage 1 [pdf, 3 MB]

   Family Safety Teams Pilot Evaluation: Stage One Baseline Study and Formative Evaluation A report prepared for the Ministry of Justice by Robyn Dixon & Deborah Widdowson Centre for Child and Family Policy Research Janet Fanslow & David Thomas Social and Community Health School of Population Health University of Auckland Trish Knaggs, Latika Vasil, Esther Banbury Ministry of Justice 31 August 2006 2

7. Tarawa - Estate of Tau Pere Pokaihau [2018] Chief Judge's MB 890 (2018 CJ 890) [pdf, 378 KB]

   ...The applicant claims that the said order is incorrect due to a mistake, error or omission in the presentation of the facts of the case to the Court, because Tau Pere Pokaihau vested all his interests to Sophie Jane Wipou and Mahue Tarawa equally through his will, however Kohatutaka 6G1A was transferred to Sophie Jane Wipou, solely. [3] The applicant claims that she has been adversely affected by the order complained of because she is not able to become an owner in Kohatutaka 6G1A as p...

8. Children and young people with charges finalised in the Youth Court June 2020 [xlsx, 333 KB]

   Contents Charges for children and young people finalised in the Youth Court This data includes all charges finalised in the Youth Court. It does not include charges transferred to the District or High Court during the court process, including charges transferred for sentencing only. The majority of children and young people who get into trouble with the law don't go to court, but are instead dealt with by Police in the community. The Youth Court deals with most criminal offending

9. Directory of Official Information G-I [pdf, 903 KB]

   Directory of Official Information Listings G-I About This is a living document. We endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email oia@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. We can send you a MS Word version if you need. Ministerial Relations and Services Strategy, Governance & Finance Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture oia@justice.govt.nz

10. Canterbury Earthquake CTV Building inquiry

    ...which could not be lifted by hand. This he described as being in contrast to the western side where as well as having large items, there was a lot of rubble that could be shifted by hand.9 Police and civilians were climbing on the rubble and searching through looking for survivors. Smoke was coming from the rubble but no flames were visible at this stage. There were also significant aftershocks occurring. The safety of Police and other rescuers who were crawling over the pile of rubble searchin...

    Located in:

    1. Coroners Court >
    2. Findings & recommendations >
    3. Findings of public interest