Search Results

1. Canterbury Westland Standards Committee v Simes [2012] NZLCDT 4 [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...received no notice. He said that the Standards Committee did not specifically refer to the full year period in its determination. As a consequence, he submitted, the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear the charge based on allegations of conduct throughout 2009. [17] For the Standards Committee, Mr W C Pyke submitted that the original complaint, which was sent to Ms Simes inviting her response, defined the scope of enquiry, as did the Notice of Hearing dated 4 May 2010. The Notice of...

2. Stewart v CAC10064 & Cooper [2013] NZREADT 58 [pdf, 58 KB]

   ...[22] One of his agents came to him, as branch manager, to advise that she was about to prepare an agreement for sale and purchase of the property. She advised him that the purchasers had told her they had previously been introduced to the property through Coopers some considerable time previously. That was about eight months previously. The buyers had advised the agent that they had previously entered into an agreement for sale and purchase of the property but it had “fallen over”....

3. Waitangi Tribunal - Mangatū Remedies Report [pdf, 3.8 MB]

   T H E M A N G A T Ū R E M E D I E S R E P O R T Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz W A I T A N G I T R I B U N A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 3 W A I 8 1 4 T H E M A N G A T Ū R E M E D I E S R E

4. MLC - 150 years of the Māori Land Court [pdf, 11 MB]

   ...FOUNDATIONS OF THE COURT 1862–1890s The government’s response was to set up the Hawke’s Bay Commission of 1873, one of the first of the many government-mandated reviews and inquiries into the Court’s actions which have been so influential throughout its history. The Hawke’s Bay Commission was a bicultural body and comprised four commissioners, two Māori (Wiremu Hikairo, of Rotorua, and Major Te Wheoro, from the Waikato) and two Pākehā (C W Richmond and F E Maning). Richm...

5. YCAP - community planning guide [pdf, 8.7 MB]

   Community action planning guide He aratohu ki ngā mahere tukanga hapori YCAP Youth crime action plan 2013–2023 GU ID E CO M M UN IT Y AC TI ON P LA NN IN G THIS ARTWORK WAS CREATED BY YOUNG PEOPLE STAYING AT CHILD, YOUTH AND FAMILY RESIDENCES 11 Contents Introduction 3 7 STEPS FOR CREATING YOUR COMMUNITY’S ACTION PLAN Flowchart 5 Preparation 6 Understand your community 8 Clarify issues 10 Involve the community 12 Set goals 14 Finalise your plan 16 Pu

6. CAC 2106 v Hu [2024] NZREADT 36 (23 September 2024) [pdf, 143 KB]

   ...[4] The defendant, Kun Hu, also known as Kevin Hu, is a licensed salesperson. He is engaged by Barfoot & Thompson, trading as Barfoot & Thompson Commercial (the agency). [5] The purchaser (and complainant) made offers to buy a property through Mr Hu which were abandoned or withdrawn. In the context of the negotiations, there were discussions between the purchaser and Mr Hu as to whether the latter would split his commission on the transaction with the former. The Tribunal...

7. Guide-3-A-Guide-to-Deportation-Appeals-by-Residents-or-Permanent-Residents.pdf [pdf, 259 KB]

   ...you first arrived holding that visa; or If you have also held a visa under your actual identity, count the 42 days from the day after the visa in your actual name expired or was cancelled. You gained your resident visa or entry permission through fraud, forgery, false or misleading representation, or concealing relevant information See ss158(1)(a) and (b) of the Act on humanitarian grounds only (if you have been convicted of a crime) OR on humanitarian grounds AND on the...

8. LCRO 162/2018 BQ v XR (29 September 2020) [pdf, 267 KB]

   ...has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee (the Committee) which, following completion of an investigation into complaints made by Mr XR, made a finding of unsatisfactory conduct against Mr BQ. Background [2] Mr XR separated from his partner.1 1 I may refer to Mr XR's former partner in this decision as "partner" for convenience, or as Ms X in correspondence quoted. 2 [3] In December 20...

9. Marshall v IDEA Services Ltd (HDC Act) [2020] NZHRRT 9 [pdf, 434 KB]

   IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2020] NZHRRT 9 Reference No. HRRT 041/2018 UNDER THE HEALTH AND DISABILITY COMMISSIONER ACT 1994 BETWEEN EAMON HENNING MARSHALL PLAINTIFF AND IDEA SERVICES LIMITED DEFENDANT AT NAPIER BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson Ms GJ Goodwin, Deputy Chairperson Ms LJ Alaeinia JP, Member Mr MJM Keefe QSM JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr GW Marshall as agent for his son Ms I Reuv

10. [2022] NZEmpC 118 New Zealand Post Primary Teachers’ Association v Board of Trustees for Rodney College [pdf, 519 KB]

    ...instruction.” These proposals were not accepted. These proposals illustrate the difficulty with the wording but were made after the dispute arose, and so I do not attribute them with any force other than being an attempt to resolve the issues through negotiation. The history of the dispute [38] As previously indicated, these proceedings were initially filed in the Authority in late 2012 in relation to an issue over reimbursement of various expenses incurred by teachers when th...