Search Results

1. HD v RWW Ltd [2017] NZDT 1032 (15 February 2017) [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...visitors’ car parking space at 4 X Street, Y Suburb. Signs specify a time limit of four hours for these spaces, and indicate that it is a towaway area 24 hours 7 days. [2] Mr HD now claims a refund of his towing fee, on the basis that he had not been parked for more than four hours. The issue to be determined is whether he was parked in excess of the time limit. Was Mr HD’s car parked in excess of the time limit? [3] The relevant law is the tort of trespass to goods. RWW is n...

2. [2023] NZEnvC 178 Waikato Regional Council v Rawhiti Environmental Park Limited [pdf, 229 KB]

   Waikato Regional Council v Rawhiti Environmental Park Limited IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2023] NZEnvC 178 IN THE MATTER OF an application pursuant to s 320 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL (ENV-2023-AKL-000139) Applicant AND RAWHITI ENVIRONMENTAL PARK LIMITED Respondent Court: Environment Judge MJL Dickey Hearing: Judicial Teleconference held 21 August 2023...

3. DR v BU Ltd [2022] NZDT 199 (22 November 2022) [pdf, 135 KB]

   ...DR APPLICANT QT RESPONDENT BU Ltd The Tribunal orders: DR and QT’s claim against BU Ltd is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 22 August 2022, the applicants’ car was towed by the respondent from a private car park in [City]. The applicants paid $420.00 to have the car released. The applicants claim the respondent did not have the right to tow their car and that the costs claimed to tow the car were not reasonable. The applicants claim $1,055.80 from...

4. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 AC revised evidence chief Shumane tracked [pdf, 403 KB]

   ...have been involved in providing reviews for local government as well as traffic impact assessment for applicants on many large developments in three countries. In 2004 I was involved completing the demand assessment and concept design of all parking facilities on the Palm Jumeira in Dubai including the marina facility. 5. My firm is currently retained on contract by Auckland Council to provide specialist traffic advice on land developments in all areas. 6. My evidence is given...

5. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 AC revised evidence chief Shumane final [pdf, 395 KB]

   ...have been involved in providing reviews for local government as well as traffic impact assessment for applicants on many large developments in three countries. In 2004 I was involved completing the demand assessment and concept design of all parking facilities on the Palm Jumeira in Dubai including the marina facility. 5. My firm is currently retained on contract by Auckland Council to provide specialist traffic advice on land developments in all areas. 6. My evidence is given...

6. [2023] NZEnvC 007 Ravenswood Developments Limited v Waimakariri Distrrict Council [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...for all transport modes between Ravenswood and Woodend. 6. Under Chapter 11 Utilities and Traffic Management, amend Policy 11.1.3.5 as follows: Policy 11.1.3.5 Except within Business 1 Zone at North Woodend (Ravenswood), Aavoid on-site parking in the Business 1 Zone where sites have frontage to a principal shopping street to enable building intensification and redevelopment while: a. maximising the use and development of on-street and public parking; b. providing for parking...

7. ENV-2016-AKL-000231 Friends of Churchill Park v Auckland Council 13 February 2017 [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...AND BETWEEN AND of the Local Government Act (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 ("LGATPA") and the Resource Management Act 1991 ("RMA") of an appeal under section 156(1) of the LGATPA FRIENDS OF CHURCHILL PARK (ENV-2016-AKL-00231 ) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Principal Environment Judge L J Newhook sitting alone under s 279 of the RMA In CHAMBERS at Auckland CONSENT ORDER [A] Under s 279(1)(b) of the Resource Management Act...

8. ENV-2016-AKL-000231 Friends of Churchill Park v Auckland Council [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...AND BETWEEN AND of the Local Government Act (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 ("LGATPA") and the Resource Management Act 1991 ("RMA") of an appeal under section 156(1) of the LGATPA FRIENDS OF CHURCHILL PARK (ENV-2016-AKL-00231 ) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Principal Environment Judge L J Newhook sitting alone under s 279 of the RMA In CHAMBERS at Auckland CONSENT ORDER [A] Under s 279(1)(b) of the Resource Management Act...

9. Evidence - Noise - Minister for Children - Rhys Hegley - Final [pdf, 424 KB]

   ...with the adopted limits and that compared to the existing noise from site, there would be little to no change. - 4 - AD-114408-1-3119-V2 5.3 The most common issue raised by the submitters was noise from the night time use of the car parks, which included both noise from vehicle movements and from staff talking. I believe that the noise from staff talking can be controlled to within suitable levels through educating staff and that management is therefore the key to this...

10. CAC 20001 v Lovegrove [2013] NZREADT 98 [pdf, 75 KB]

    ...would not impede the view from the Property.” [3] It was first seen by Ms Graham on 19th February 2011. Ms Graham says that she and her sister Linda Harrison noticed that next to the building on Davies Avenue was a ground level gravel car park. She said that when she viewed the property on the 19th February 2011 she asked Ms Lovegrove if anything was planned to be built on the car park. She says that Ms Lovegrove responded that nothing was planned at present however someth...