Search Results

1. CD v X Ltd [2024] NZDT 262 (26 March 2024) [pdf, 140 KB]

   ...RESPONDENT X Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On the 14th of November 2023, CD was issued with a breach notice for parking at the [shopping centre]. The breach notice stated that she had “parked without permission in authorised vehicle only car park.” 2. CD appealed the breach notice with QF, a division of X Ltd. That appeal was not allowed, and QF indicated that the breach notice stood. 3. CD appealed again, and that...

2. AAE v ZZV [2012] NZDT 32 (18 May 2012) [pdf, 66 KB]

   ...Towing Company Ltd shall pay AAE the sum of $250.00 by 4pm on 1 June 2012. Facts [1] In the evening of 26 November 2012, AAE had dinner in the food court of the XY Plaza. AAE parked his car at the Plaza sometime between 8–8.30pm. The parking is only for customers. The food court closed at 9 pm, but AAE spent the next 35–40 minutes chatting outside one of the entrances (it was the night of the General Election). At 9.40 pm he discovered his car was missing. It had b...

3. GM v Q Ltd [2024] NZDT 722 (22 August 2024) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...RESPONDENT Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. GM is not liable to Q Ltd for $320.00 claimed under Q Ltd’s [reference]. 2. The claim by Q Ltd against GM is dismissed. Reasons Introduction 1. On 11 March 2024, GM (‘GM’) parked in the car park of N Ltd. She was in the park for approximately seven minutes. In May 2024, GM received information from Q Ltd that she had been in breach of using the park and had been sent a breach notice and three reminder notices. GM s...

4. UN & QN v U Ltd [2023] NZDT 443 (9 September 2023) [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...RESPONDENT & COUNTER- CLAIMANT (amended) U Ltd The Tribunal orders: U Ltd shall pay UN and QN $500.00 by 26 September 2023. U Ltd’s counterclaim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. The UN and QN have been staying at Holiday Park for a summer holiday every year for 20+ years. Site 129 was their favourite and one of the six adjacent waterfront sites they preferred. 2. As is customary in such holiday parks, long-term regular guests have the first option to rebook...

5. II v XQ Ltd [2021] NZDT 1610 (6 July 2021) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...Ltd is not liable to refund to II the sum of $5.00; II must pay XQ Ltd $60.00 within 28 days. Reasons [1] II seeks a declaration from the Disputes Tribunal that he is not liable to pay $65.00 to the respondent company, XQ Ltd. [2] II parked his car on the evening on 9 June 2021 in a car park that had a sign at the entrance that stated “XQ Ltd, Public Parking (Conditions apply). II could not recall if he paid to park, but accepts that, if he did, the period for which he paid...

6. LT v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 690 (13 November 2024) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...APPLICANT LT RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: B Ltd is to pay LT the sum of $65 on or before 6 December 2024. Reasons 1. LT is the owner of a car, driven by her daughter who parked for 7 minutes beyond the 180 minute parking limit at a private carpark on [Street]. 2. LT’s daughter was parked there while she used the gym services of one of the customer businesses for whom B Ltd provides parking enforcement. 3. LT appealed the notice on the basis that t...

7. [2023] NZEnvC 153 Argosy Property No.1 Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 287 KB]

   ...Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part (AUP). Background [2] PC71 is a Council-initiated plan change and arose in response to the requirements of Policy 11 of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 (NPS-UD) to remove all car parking minimums, and provisions that had the effect of requiring car parking minimums, from the AUP. Policy 11 of the NPS-UD provides: Policy 11: In relation to car parking (a) the district plans of tier 1, 2, and 3 territorial authoritie...

8. ENVC Matiatia party corresp WMLFeb15 affidavit M Dunn [pdf, 17 MB]

   ...these proceedings. A notice of motion filed by Direction Matialia Incorporated ("DMI ") seeks an order that the amendments are out of scope. The specific focus of DMI's notice of motion is the amendments made to provision for car parking for the proposed marina. 4. I have been instructed by WML to provide advice on the planning framework surrounding the car parking options for the revised marina layout which Mr Wardale and Mr Mitchell have identified in their affi...

9. ENVC Matiatia party correspondence - WML Feb15 - affidavit M Dunn [pdf, 17 MB]

   ...these proceedings. A notice of motion filed by Direction Matialia Incorporated ("DMI ") seeks an order that the amendments are out of scope. The specific focus of DMI's notice of motion is the amendments made to provision for car parking for the proposed marina. 4. I have been instructed by WML to provide advice on the planning framework surrounding the car parking options for the revised marina layout which Mr Wardale and Mr Mitchell have identified in their affi...

10. Vercoe v Savage - Otonga Whanau Trust [2021] Chief Judge's MB 838 (2021 CJ 838) [pdf, 280 KB]

    ...cancelling orders made at 96 Waiariki Minute Book 278-292 dated 2 May 2014, terminating the Otonga Whānau Trust and transferring 1.000 share in Lot 39A Sec.2B No. 2B No. 2A Parish of Matata from the Otonga Whānau trust to Clement James Nepia Park. [2] The applicant claims that Clement James Nepia Park is not a member of the preferred class of alienee. They effectively seek to keep the whakapapa to the land in-tact by ensuring only owners, their descendants and whanaunga are on th...