BE v TU Ltd [2021] NZDT 1568 (29 July 2021) [pdf, 182 KB]
...would be towed. It says the warnings a car could be towed was sufficient notice to BE that the private landowner could exercise their rights either in contract or tort, to remove his car. TU Ltd says the towing fee reflects its costs to provide the service to the landowner. 5. The burden is on BE to prove TU Ltd had no right to tow his car. Having carefully considered both positions I find BE has not discharged that burden. Mr BE parked at night but there were sufficient warning sign...