Search Results

1. CD Ltd v CO Ltd [2022] NZDT 279 (10 November 2022) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...District Court [2022] NZDT 279 APPLICANT CD Ltd RESPONDENT CO Ltd The Tribunal orders: CO Ltd is to pay $9152.91 to CD Ltd on or before 24 November 2022. Reasons 1. In late 2021, over several months, CD Ltd provided trucking services to CO Ltd across 12 construction sites, removing materials including soil, clay, rubbish and rocks and tipping them at waste management yards or quarries. CD Ltd also supplied and delivered aggregate materials to various sites for CO L...

2. HC v T Ltd [2025] NZDT 195 (10 May 2025) [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. T Ltd is to pay HC $4,600.00 on or before 5 June 2025. 2. Payment is to be made by way of direct credit to [bank account details] in the name of HC. Reasons: 1. HC provided educational assessment services as a contractor to T Ltd. HC alleges T Ltd wrongly terminated her services and she claims $21,943.76 compensation for loss of income, legal fees and the application fee. 2. The issues I must decide are: a. Did T Ltd bre...

3. MLC - Form 53 - Application for Māori Land Court special aid [pdf, 86 KB]

   ...Where fax or email addresses are given these may be used as a means of notice and service. Fee: $60.00 10. LAWYER/PROVIDER TO COMPLETE (only if you answered Yes in question 3) Date instructions received. Dated: / / Estimated time frame to complete services. Total likely cost of services for which Special Aid is sought (GST inclusive) using Agency Standard Rates is: 11. Where no standard rate applies complete the following estimate (GST inclusive) Preparation $ Attendances $ Readi...

4. TO v OM Ltd [2021] NZDT 1698 (20 May 2021) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...that were promotional offers that came with the camera. He checked his account and discovered that $5,972.00 had been deducted. He raised the issue with the store manager, but was told that the there was nothing he could do and that the eftpos card service provider would reverse the transaction, usually overnight. The transactions were not reversed however, until 2 December. 2. TO said that as the funds were removed from his account, he was unable to take advantage of Black Friday s...

5. BI v O Ltd [2024] NZDT 269 (27 February 2024) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...windscreen. 3. The issues for the Disputes Tribunal to determine are; a) whether OX took all reasonable precautions when repairing the chip? b) whether OX reasonably disclosed the consequences if the chip was not repaired? c) Whether the service was reasonable? 4. The relevant law is the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993.In that services are to be provided with reasonable care and skill. whether OX took all reasonable precautions when repairing the chip? 5. I find that...

6. NO v UM [2023] NZDT 629 (21 November 2023) [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 629 APPLICANT NO RESPONDENT UM The Tribunal orders: UM is to pay $900.00 to NO by no later than 20th December 2023. Reasons: 1. UM engaged NO, who operates a gardening services business trading as “BN”, to undertake gardening work on her property. She sent photos to NO showing the section and the tidying up work that was required. 2. A written quote in the amount of $1,200.00 was provided to UM whic...

7. IQ & OU v EQ [2022] NZDT 278 (19 December 2022) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...and OU entitled to claim a refund of their $2,000.00 deposit? Was the service provided by EQ on time or within a reasonable timeframe? 4. The Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 (CGA) applies if a person is a ‘consumer’ and the person from whom services are obtained, is a supplier. A consumer is defined in s 2 as a person who “acquires from a supplier goods or services of a kind ordinarily acquired for personal, domestic or household use”. A person in trade is defined as a person i...

8. BG v P Ltd [2024] NZDT 638 (2 September 2024) [pdf, 144 KB]

   ...BG against P Ltd is dismissed. Reasons 1. ED, made upper and lower dentures for BG. BG now brings a claim against P Ltd which is the respondent company, in the sum of $4000.00. 2. The issues to be resolved are: (a) Did ED provide their services with reasonable care and skill and were the dentures reasonably fit for purpose? (c) If not, what is the remedy? Did ED provide their services with reasonable care and skill and were the dentures reasonably fit for purpose? 3....

9. Frequently asked questions

    If the information you're looking for isn't on this page, or if you have any other questions, please contact Coronial Services by emailing  coronial.response@justice.govt.nz  or phoning 0800 88 88 20. On this page, you'll find links to frequently asked questions (FAQs) about the different areas of the coronial Inquiry into the 15 March 2019 Christchurch masjidain attack. These FAQs have been produced to help you understand the process of the Inquiry.  See the FAQs about:...

   Located in:

   1. Coroners Court >
   2. Christchurch Masjidain Attack Inquiry

10. INZ v Soni [2018] NZIACDT 6 (9 March 2018) [pdf, 315 KB]

    ...lawyer or included in certain other specific categories of persons. There are some limited exceptions to the general principle, but the restriction applies everywhere in the world. [3] The regime requires licensed immigration advisers to perform the services personally. They are different from other professionals who can usually allow non-qualified staff to provide many services under the supervision of a qualified professional. [4] This Tribunal, unfortunately, has been required...