Search Results

1. LA - Part 2 - Areas of Law Family [pdf, 710 KB]

   ...AREAS OF LAW – FAMILY – MOJ0052.2-MARCH14 PAGE 1 / 6 Please complete this if you are applying for approval for the Family Jurisdiction. If you hold lead provider approval for Family and are applying for approval to provide the Family Legal Advice Service, please complete section 5. PART 2 – SECTION 1 Experience in the Family Jurisdiction Length of experience How long have you practised (post admission) in this area of law? Approval I am seeking approval as a lead provider for:...

2. OT US v N Ltd [2023] NZDT 169 (8 June 2023) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...the parking area which is part of N Ltd’s business. OT and US now bring a claim against N Ltd for $3,731.23. 2. The issues to be resolved are: (a) Did N Ltd breach their duty of care to look after the car? (b) If not, did N Ltd provide its services with reasonable care and skill? (c) If not what is the remedy? Did N LTD breach their duty of care to look after the car? 3. Background: OT who is named as one of the applicants, drove US’ car and parked the car in the yard...

3. KJ v OU Ltd [2022] NZDT 216 (16 November 2022) [pdf, 115 KB]

   ...reasonable care and skill? (b) If not, what is the remedy? Was the towbar fitted with reasonable care and skill? 3. The law relevant to this claim is as follows: The Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 (CGA) provides guarantees to consumers who obtain services from a tradesperson. Section 28 of the CGA provides that where services are supplied to a consumer there is a guarantee that the service will be carried out with reasonable care and skill. 4. Section 29 of the CGA provides th...

4. NT v J Ltd [2023] NZDT 489 (26 September 2023) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...2. NT claims $4999.00 for stress, clothes, backpackers fee and a meal, but primarily she said her claim was not about the money but to penalise the driver and the company. 3. The issues to be determined are: a. Did the company carry out the services with reasonable care and skill? b. If not, what sum, if any, must the company pay? Did the company carry out the services with reasonable care and skill? 4. Section 28 of the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 (CGA) provides that whe...

5. HC v S Ltd [2023] NZDT 482 (6 July 2023) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...working space per month and unlimited use of a business lounge. He signed up with [Shopping Mall] and thought he was CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 accessing their business lounge. After five days he was told he could not access the services for another month. HC says that at no time was he told [Shopping Mall] did not have a business lounge and was not advised of any other locations that had business lounge services. 6. The website states S Ltd provides unlimited access...

6. LW v N Ltd [2024] NZDT 352 (13 May 2024) [pdf, 133 KB]

   ...immigration, and again asked N Ltd to ‘please proceed to obtain this exemption’. Over the next five weeks LW and N Ltd corresponded regarding meeting to execute the declaration which occurred on 26 January 2024. Same day LW paid $5,000.00 to N Ltd for its services engaging with the OIO and lodging the declaration and N Ltd emailed LW saying that ‘there is no guarantee that they [OIO] will approve and I expect the first thing they will want to see is that you at least have a Residence...

7. DD Ltd v QW & BD Ltd [2024] NZDT 499 (27 February 2024) [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...outside, will need to be stripped back and the job started over. Work to damaged joinery is also part of the counter-claim as well as the scaffolding needed to carry out the work. 4. The issues to be determined are: • Did DD Ltd provide its service with reasonable care and skill and was the product of the service fit for purpose? • What remedy is available to QW? Did DD Ltd provide its service with reasonable care and skill and was the product of the service fit for pur...

8. LCRO 189/2016 EM v FN and GP (19 May 2017) [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...fees. Having determined that it has jurisdiction to consider the complaint about the fees charged by Ms EM, the Committee notes that Ms EM’s retainer was terminated on 3 February 2016. While the invoice rendered by Ms EM states that it is for services rendered to 3 February 2016, these were also charged for services following termination of the retainer. This occurred when Ms EM was specifically advised not to do any further work on the transaction. [123 Bank] confirmed that Ms EM...

9. Notice of Motion and Affidavit of support [pdf, 3.7 MB]

   QUEENSTOWN OFFICE: Level 3, 36 Shoto"er Street, Queenstown 9300 FRANKTON OFFICE: Levell , Alta House, TerraceJul1ction , Frankton 9300 POSTAL: P.o. Box 124, Queenstown 9348 , NZ I AvV,{FRS {\., j' J 01ARY 1 Ul~ Ie PHONE: +6~· (3) 44 1 274-3 FAX: +64 (3) 44 1 2976 MOB: +64 (0) 27 433 O'~5 7 12 December 2016 The Registrar Christchurch Environment Court PO Box 2069 Christchurch 8013 Dear Sir EMAIL: grael11e@gtodcUaw.col11 WEB: \\'\\'w.gtudcUaw.col11...

10. MH & QH v I Ltd [2023] NZDT 597 (2 November 2023) [pdf, 208 KB]

    ...for purpose? b) Was the pergola installed with reasonable skill and care? c) What is the remedy? (i) Are the defects of a substantial character? Procedural issues. 5. Two hearings of the matter were held. The first was on the 21 March 2023 by phone with MH & QH and a representative from I Ltd on the telephone. Various witnesses were also spoken to. I completed a decision adjourning the hearing on that date. 6. The matter was then set down for second hearing on the 30 October...