LCRO 196/2016 GY v SO (15 September 2017) [pdf, 194 KB]
...that matter. [9] The issue on this review concerns Ms SO’s disclosure to Mr YR of the information imparted to her firm by Ms GY during Ms GY’s enquiry. Complaint [10] Ms GY lodged a complaint with the New Zealand Law Society Complaints Service (NZLS) on 8 April 2016. The substance of her complaint was that: (a) Having established that Ms SO’s firm previously acted for Mr YR, the receptionist ought to have ended the phone call and not asked further questions of Ms GY....