3963 items matching your search terms
...t\ ~ ,1/ MINISTRY OF ' ~til JUSTICE \;,;,. ~ Tahu o te lure If you are not satisfied with this response, you have the right to make a complaint to the Ombudsman under section 28(3) of the Act. The Ombudsman may be contacted by phone on 0800 802 602 or by email to info@ombudsman.parliament.nz Nāku noa, nā Kelvin Watson Deputy Secretary, Corporate Services
...-~-}.~ Ju SJ,IS! If you are not satisfied with this response, you have the right to make a complaint to the Ombudsman under section 28(3) of the Act. The Office of the Ombudsman may be contacted by email to info@ombudsman.parliament.nz or by phone on 0800 802 602. Nāku noa, nā Sam Kunowski General Manager, Courts and Justice Services Policy ct;-----J
...Ministry of Justice If you are not satisfied with this response, you have the right to make a complaint to the Ombudsman under section 28(3) of the Act. The Office of the Ombudsman may be contacted by email to info@ombudsman.parliament.nz or by phone on 0800 802 602. Nāku noa, nā Peter Cowan Director, National Security Operations
If the information you're looking for isn't on this page, or if you have any other questions, please contact Coronial Services by emailing coronial.response@justice.govt.nz or phoning 0800 88 88 20. On this page: Sentencing decision Royal Commission of Inquiry Report Sentencing decision Brenton Harrison Tarrant was sentenced at the High Court at Christchurch, New Zealand at a hearing which ran from Monday 24 August 2020 to Thursday 27 August 2020. The sentencing notes of the presiding Judge,...
...Ministry of Justice If you are not satisfied with this response, you have the right to make a complaint to the Ombudsman under section 28(3) of the Act. The Office of the Ombudsman may be contacted by email to info@ombudsman.parliament.nz or by phone on 0800 802 602. Nāku noa, nā Jacquelyn Shannon Group Manager, Courts and Tribunals, Regional Service Delivery s9(2)(a) s9(2)(a) https://www.justice.govt.nz/about/official-information-act-requests/oia-responses/...
...dragging his body down so he had to swim as fast as he could to get out. Jordan went back up the bank and jumped in again. He resurfaced briefly, swam three or four strokes before going under and not resurfacing again. Just after 9:00pm emergency services located Jordan deceased approximately three kilometres downstream from where he jumped in. A post mortem and toxicology testing was carried out. Alcohol at a concentration level of 187 mg per 100 ml of blood and 240 mg per 100 ml of...
...the timeframe in s 40(1) of the PA. [5.1.2] Whether there was undue delay in making the information available in response to Mr Cheng’s requests. [5.1.3] Whether Corrections had a proper basis to withhold information about the removal of phone numbers from Mr Cheng’s phone number list under s 29 of the PA (or any other statutory withholding ground). [5.2] Whether Corrections failed to comply with s 42 of the PA when providing Mr Cheng with a disc containing part of the resp...
...being prepared, there was no direct contact between Mr Parker and the complainant. The numerous exchanges between Mr Zhao and the complainant show only the discussion of matters relating to the business. The only exception was Mr Zhao, on the telephone, obtaining information from the complainant for the preparation of the application form(s) to be subsequently reviewed by Mr Parker. [57] It is contended by Mr Moses that there is no evidence that Mr Zhao provided immigration advice...
...Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1347 APPLICANT MD RESPONDENT O Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. MD sent a computer to her daughter using a courier service through her employer. MD’s employer has a book of postal credits associated with the return of magazine ‘headers’ for audit purposes. MD sent the computer using a ticket from the book (Courier Ticket). 2. O Limited says tha...
...District Court [2023] NZDT 225 APPLICANT DT RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: DT’s claim against T Ltd is dismissed. Reasons: 1. The applicant engaged the respondent to dig a trench and provide and drainage services to it in 2019. The applicant paid the respondent a total of $17,720.36 for these services. The applicant claims that after heavy rain in June 2022 and thereafter, water is seeping into the rumpus room in his house which is adjacent to w...