Search Results

1. KT & LT v X Ltd [2025] NZDT 266 (8 July 2025) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...$20,000.00 for the reduction in value of their property, together with compensation for the cost of the arborist and for other costs they have incurred in relation to this claim. 2. The issues to be resolved are: a. Did X Ltd provide the delivery service with reasonable care and skill? b. If not, what if any damages are payable? Did WWNZGL provide the delivery service with reasonable care and skill? 3. I am satisfied that the delivery driver did not provide the delivery servic...

2. Report of the NZ Prostitution Law Committee 2008 [pdf, 642 KB]

   Report of the Prostitution Law Review Committee on the Operation of the Prostitution Reform Act 2003 2 © Crown Copyright Published May 2008 Ministry of Justice PO Box 180 Wellington New Zealand ISBN 978-0-478-29052-7 Disclaimer The views, opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this

3. COVID-19 Justice Sector Survey - Report 4 for the period 5 to 11 May 2020 [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   1 COVID-19 Justice Sector Survey Report 004 (5–11 May 2020) This telephone survey provides information about how safe people feel and what crime and safety issues matter to them most. The report covers the following key topics:  Social connection  Perceptions of safety, including reasons why people feel unsafe  Experience of some types of crimes (for example, fraud and cybercrime which are increasingly of concern internationally)  Crimes reported and not repor...

4. Miraka Limited.pdf [pdf, 234 KB]

   ...of the proceedings. DATED this 29th day of September 2020 MIRAKA LIMITED by its solicitors and authorised agents Buddle Findlay: Jennifer Caldwell/ Mathew Gribben BF\60463293\2 Page 4 Address for service of person wishing to be a party: Miraka Limited c/- Jennifer Caldwell / Mathew Gribben Buddle Findlay Level 17 188 Quay Street Auckland PO Box 1433, DX CP24024, Auckland 1140 Phone: 64 9 358 2555 Facsimile: 64 9 358 2055 Em...

5. IH v LM [2022] NZDT 136 (3 August 2022) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...stated, then the wrong respondent has been named on the fencing notice and in this claim. However, since I do not have firm evidence of ownership and the respondent on the claim could be easily corrected, I prefer to base my decision on the issue of service. 6. Section 12(1) provides that any notice to be served on any person shall be delivered to that person, and may be delivered to that person either personally or by registered letter. Although CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 re...

6. BD Ltd v N Ltd [2023] NZDT 165 (27 June 2023) [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...their email contact in June 2022, is acceptance of N Ltd accepting the terms of engagement. I find it does not extend to acceptance in 2022 where there has been no re-engagement of terms or any acceptance from N Ltd that they agreed to recruitment services in 2022. There was no acknowledged acceptance that BD Ltd provided a service to N Ltd. The June/July emails do not constitute an offer, acceptance and consideration or intention to create legal relations. Therefore, the elements of cont...

7. BF & NF v BN Ltd [2023] NZDT 24 (19 January 2023) [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...carrier intentionally loses or damages them. 9. There was no evidence that BN Ltd intentionally damaged the chest of drawers. BN Ltd had no liability for the damage to BF and NF’s goods. 10. Under the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993, where services are supplied to a consumer there is a guarantee that the service will be carried out with reasonable care and skill (s 28). Although I accept BF and NF’s evidence, that BN Ltd likely did not handle their chest of drawers with care, the...

8. DG v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 253 (26 March 2024) [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...APPLICANT DG RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: B Ltd is to pay $1,482.41 to DG before 26 April 2024. Reasons 1. DG purchased a [laptop] on 30 August 2019. In October 2023 it ceased working and an Authorised [brand] Service Provider found that the logic board had failed. 2. Cody claims $1,482.41 from B Ltd being the cost to replace the logic board. The issue to be resolved is whether DG’s [laptop] is of acceptable quality. 3. The relevant law is the...

9. GE v G Ltd [2024] NZDT 672 (19 August 2024) [pdf, 114 KB]

   ...tiles. 4. The issue to be determined is whether G Ltd carried out the work with reasonable care and skill. Did G Ltd carry out the work with reasonable care and skill? 5. Section 28 of the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 (CGA) provides that where services are supplied to a consumer, there is a guarantee that the service will be carried out with reasonable care and skill. 6. GE provided the two invoices from [Plumbing Company], the quotation from G Ltd, photographs that show damage c...

10. KD v SQ [2025] NZDT 52 (18 February 2025) [pdf, 171 KB]

    ...that it is a volunteer organisation, and none of the trustees who lead any of the trust’s projects, or organise any trust events, are paid to do so. The trust deed expressly states that board members shall not be entitled to remuneration for their services. 3) The relevant law is the law as to quasi-contracts. The issue to be determined by the Tribunal is whether the respondent has any obligation to compensate the applicant for his time in organising the event referred to in his clai...