4036 items matching your search terms
...Official Information Act responses | New Zealand Ministry of Justice If you are not satisfied with this response, you have the right to make a complaint to the Ombudsman under section 28 of the Act. The Office of the Ombudsman may be contacted by phone on: 0800 802 602, by email at: info@ombudsman.parliament.nz, or via the webform: Make a complaint (for members of the public) | Ombudsman New Zealand Nāku noa, nā Jacquelyn Shannon Group Manager, Courts & Trib...
...applicants had not paid the deposit, and there is no evidence of Mr JP having sent the authority to the agent on 26 March 2015. [4] The applicants paid the deposit into the agent’s trust account on 27 March 2015. [5] On 31 March 2015 the agent phoned Mr JP, asked him to sign the authority, and reminded him he would need the applicants’ instructions before he did so. [6] Although there is no direct evidence from the agent, the materials available on review suggest the age...
...prescribed under this Act, shall be entitled to receive from his employer payment for his work at not less than that minimum rate. [31] No other statute defines “work” for the purposes of the Minimum Wage Act, but s 6 was considered in Idea Services Ltd v Dickson.8 In Idea Services the full Court reviewed extensive evidence about Mr Dickson’s work as a community service worker, after his normal duties ended and he began what was colloquially referred to as a “sleepover”...
CROOK V SOVEREIGN SERVICES LTD WN WC 34/07 18 December 2007 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON WC 34/07 WRC 14/06 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN JENNIFER MARY CROOK Plaintiff AND SOVEREIGN SERVICES LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 29, 30, 31 October and 1 and 2 November 2007 (Heard at Wellington) Appearances: B A Buckett, Counsel fo rthe Plaintiff Peter Churchman and Bridget Fleming, Counsel...
...request for official information as soon as practicably but within a maximum of 20 working days. The Ombudsman website has a time limit calculator. Providing a receipt is not a statutory requirement, but it is best practice. It provides a better service to the public and shows good faith with the requester. The OIA applies to the Ministry, but excludes courts and tribunals in the exercise of their judicial functions (see s 236 and Schedule 1 District Court Act 2016) I <~...
...purchased together. Her solicitor initially contacted NP of F Ltd in January 2022 to enquire about whether the business could carry out accounting work required for the case. 2. NP then made contact directly with YM and discussed the case over the phone, sending her through a letter of engagement to sign. On 1 February 2022, YM signed the letter of engagement, which provided hourly rates and gave an estimate of costs for the work of between $6000-$10,000.00. YM paid a deposit of $3000...
...dysplasia. 3. CK and HC are claiming $15,114.17 from KD being the refund of the purchase price of $4500 together with the costs of OP’s diagnosis and treatment. 4. At today’s hearing only CK and HC attended. KD was contacted three times on the phone number provided (between 9.15 and 9.25) but each call went to answerphone. The hearing can proceed in the absence of a party (see s42 Disputes Tribunal Act) 5. The issues for determination are: a) Was KD in trade of selling do...
...collision, was driving his father’s vehicle unsupervised, and according to BI, ID did not have L plates visible at the time of the collision. Although initially responsive, BI said that he only had ID’s contact details on social media, no actual phone number or email. ID did not send his email address as promised, and stopped responding to BI’s calls online. BI eventually found ID’s parents address that is publicly available through social media and brought a claim to the Tribun...
...showing an F53 error code fault. BD was referred by [Appliance Brand] to the Respondent, B Ltd (trading as [redacted] Family Business) (“B Ltd”), which is [Appliance Brand]’s service agent in the [Region] area. BD has not been satisfied with the services she received from B Ltd and brings a claim against B Ltd seeking damages of $519.88, being the repair cost she paid to B Ltd ($227.99), the cost of the second-hand replacement washing machine that she purchased to replace the Machine...
...for the estates and the trusts where her interests conflict with those of her clients. Review hearing [14] Both parties attended a review hearing in [Town] on 25 July 2017. Ms VN was accompanied by Ms R, a lawyer who had provided regulated services to the executors and trustees on behalf of the firm, and Mr J VN, a brother. Nature and scope of review [15] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:2...