Search Results

1. JL v P Ltd & SX [2024] NZDT 685 (27 August 2024) [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...remediate the bed. 7. The matter was heard over two hearings. SX did not attend either. The hearing proceeded in her absence pursuant to s42 of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988. 8. The issues to be determined are: a. Who supplied the services and who were the contracting parties? b. Was there a failure to produce the outcome made known, or a failure to produce the outcome within the agreed timeframe? c. If not, what is the remedy? Who supplied the services and w...

2. OIA-124051.pdf [pdf, 849 KB]

   Legal Services Commissioner Justice Centre I 19 Aitken Street I DX SX10125 I Wellington T 04 918 8800 I F 04 918 8820 lsc@justice.govt.nz 28 August 2025 Our ref: OIA 124051 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Legal aid costs for Danny and Roberto Jaz Thank you for your email of 22 July 2025, requesting the total amount paid to lawyers acting for Mr Danny and Mr Roberto Jaz from Legal Aid Services, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act). Specif...

3. DD v H Ltd [2023] NZDT 536 (17 October 2023) [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 536 APPLICANT DD RESPONDENT H Ltd The Tribunal orders: DD Must pay H Ltd $1,012.00 by 4pm on 7 November 2023. Reasons: 1. The respondent provided the services of an electrician to the applicant. The applicant was charged $1,257.38 for this work of which $195.00 has been paid to date. The applicant is unhappy with the work and the amount she was charged and has not paid the invoice. The ap...

4. TH v D Ltd [2025] NZDT 230 (7 July 2025) [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...outside the monetary limit of the Tribunal. Further as the other issues relate to the same subject matter separate claims cannot be brought in the Tribunal (assuming that was intended). 6. The issues I have to consider are: a. Was the service carried out with reasonable care and skill/Was the service reasonably fit for purpose? b. If not, what remedy is available? Was the service carried out with reasonable care and skill//Was the service reasonably fit for purp...

5. 2017 NZSSAA 023 (24 May 2017) [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...Mr XXXX sent an email asking how the reviewed amount had been calculated. He referred to his letter of 19 October and asked the Ministry to confirm which amounts had been allowed. [8] On 30 November 2015 Mr XXXX wrote again. He referred to a phone call from someone who explained that the sum of $7 was the amount satisfying the 1995 order of the Authority. He asked that the mileage rate be increased to 67 cents per km to reflect the fixed cost of running his car, increasing the...

6. 1. Ngati Paoa Trust Board's section 274 notice - Americas Cup proceedings - 6 September [pdf, 134 KB]

   ...agrees to participate in mediation or other alternative dispute resolution of the Application. DATED 6 September 2018 _____________________________ J D K Gardner-Hopkins Counsel for the Board 3 The Board’s address for service is C/- James Gardner-Hopkins, Barrister, PO Box 25-160, Wellington 6011. Documents for service on the Board may be left at that address for service or may be emailed to james@jghbarrister.com. Service by email is preferred, with recei...

7. NS v T Ltd [2021] NZDT 1593 (23 June 2021) [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...original order by Referee Meyer in this matter, but before this rehearing of the matter, NS sold his boat, including the faulty motor, to a third party. 5. The issues to be determined are: a) Was there a binding settlement agreement? b) Were T Ltd’s services fit for the purpose? c) Was NS entitled to cancel the contract? d) What sum, if any, is payable between the parties? Was there a binding settlement agreement? CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 6. A consumer who has a claim...

8. BT v KG [2020] NZDT 1457 (16 March 2020) [pdf, 223 KB]

   ...Partridges Jewellers in [town]. (“Partridges”). Partridges had valued the watch at $12,550.00. 3. Shortly after receiving the watch BT took it to Partridges to have the valuation put into his name for insurance purposes. He also asked for a service to be carried out on the watch. 4. The watch was sent to Rolex in Australia for a service. It was returned, and Rolex indicated that it could not carry out a service on the watch as it was non-genuine. 5. BT is seeking an orde...

9. MG and WJ New Zealand Ltd v DI Ltd [2021] NZDT 1358 (15 January 2021) [pdf, 224 KB]

   ...$595.00 in relation to that issue. 5. DIL did not attend the hearing – the absence of a party does not prevent a hearing from proceeding or an order from being made. 6. The issues to determine are: • Did DIL provide its installation service with respect to the external unit with reasonable care and skill? CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 • If not, what remedy is available to MG? • Was the condensation pump provided by DIL of acceptable quality, and if not, is th...

10. DN v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 248 (4 April 2024) [pdf, 180 KB]

    ...remedying the fault. When goods are rejected by the consumer, then the goods must be returned to the trader, therefore DN must return the fridge to B Ltd. 7. I find that DN is not entitled to the reimbursement of the $30.00. The $30.00 was for a service, being the delivery of the fridge. While the service would not be required if the fridge was not purchased, it was purchased and the delivery was separate to the purchase. The delivery was completed within in a timely manner. There was n...