Search Results

1. ML Ltd & PQ v ST & NT [2024] NZDT 534 (1 October 2024) [pdf, 239 KB]

   ...cancel the agreement. 3. ML Ltd seek the return of the dogs and or monetary compensation to the value of $30,000.00. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 5 4. ST and NT, seek an order that the dogs are theirs and counter claim $26,445.00 for unpaid services and compensation. 5. The issues to be resolved are: a. What was the original agreement between ML Ltd and ST and NT? b. Was the agreement varied and if so, what was the variation/s? c. Was the agreement breached? d. If so, is...

2. BK & DU Ltd & WL v UX Ltd [2021] NZDT 1663 (8 July 2021) [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...have advised it about bright-line tax prior to the purchase taking place and because he didn’t the trust had to pay tax it was not expecting to pay. Mr X does not accept any liability for the claim based on the terms of engagement and client care service information addressed to the trust dated 25 October 2017 (“terms of engagement”). 2. The trust is claiming $29,996.40 made up as follows: (a) Amount of reassessed bright-line tax payable to the IRD: $19,383.00 (b) Legal...

3. DF v Q Ltd [2023] NZDT 177 (19 April 2023) [pdf, 143 KB]

   ...the supermarket and to deliver cat food to the tenants and $50 for 2 hours of Q Ltd’s EF’s time helping DF sort her belongings in the garage. Issues 6. The issues for the Tribunal to consider are: (a) Whether Q Ltd failed to provide its service to DF with reasonable care and skill. (b) If so, whether DF is entitled to compensation and if so, how much (c) Whether Q Ltd is entitled to travel costs to feed the cat and for EF’s time. Has Q Ltd failed to provide its service to...

4. WH v P Ltd [2023] NZDT 542 (16 October 2023) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...further evidence to the Tribunal which they both did. 3. The issues to be determined by the Tribunal were: a. What work was the respondent contracted to do? b. Has the respondent breached the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 by not providing its services within a reasonable time? c. If so, has the respondent been given a reasonable opportunity to remedy any breach? d. Has the respondent repudiated the contract? e. If so, is the applicant entitled to cancel the contract and have a...

5. EB & NB v O Ltd [2024] NZDT 360 (28 March 2024) [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...Ltd was called, not after. 6. The issues I have to consider are: a. Has there been a breach of O Ltd’s terms and conditions because the car was driven to [Town], not towed? b. Has there been a breach of an implied guarantee to carry out services with reasonable care and skill? c. If so, what loss is suffered? CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 5 Has there been a breach of O Ltd’s terms and conditions because the car was driven to [Town], not towed? 7. A contr...

6. BE & TE v NX [2024] NZDT 605 (16 September 2024) [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...particular software to create the fusion video. 3. BE and TE reached out to NX, the owner of NXP, in March 2024, some six and a half years after the wedding to obtain the fusion video. NX advised that she no longer had the software to provide the service. Instead, she offered three different options but these were not acceptable to BE and TE. 4. They now file a claim seeking a refund of the $800 paid to NXP for the fusion video. Issues 5. I outline the key issues as follows:...

7. KS v G Ltd & D Ltd [2025] NZDT 221 (17 June 2025) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...carriage allowed D Ltd to change the aircraft at any time before departure. D Ltd had made a change to the aircraft and as a result it could not offer the premium economy class. 6. The issues to resolve the claim are: (a) Did D Ltd provide the service it agreed to provide? (b) If not, what loss has KS incurred that he is entitled to be compensated for? Did D Ltd provide the service it agreed to provide? 7. When the issue first arose, KS emailed the travel agent from the...

8. [2006] NZEmpC WC 23/06 Spotless Services (NZ) Ltd v Morrison [pdf, 81 KB]

   SPOTLESS SERVICES (NEW ZEALAND) LTD V MORRISON WN WC 23/06 4 December 2006 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON WC 23/06 WRC 10/06 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN SPOTLESS SERVICES (NEW ZEALAND) LTD Plaintiff AND LISA MORRISON Defendant Hearing: 30 and 31 August 2006 (Heard at Wellington) Appearances: P A McBride, Counsel for the Plaintiff I Hard and N P Bourke, Counsel for the Defendant...

9. Te Manutukutuku 73 [pdf, 9.5 MB]

   ...in this Kia ora tatou. It is with great pleasure that I once again provide an update on the work of the Waitangi Tribunal Unit over the last six months. I first want to acknowledge the chal- lenging work the staff are carrying out to deliver services to the Tribunal across a range of inquiries. I am proud of the ways in which they are From the Director responding to those challenges with the usual standards of high-quality and professional work. Noticeably as well, staff are demo...

10. OIA-118546.pdf [pdf, 2.5 MB]

    ...SPltkNZ '? ~ 12:04PM + e Jo<io - MOJPoi,cy Jono. oug t ey never bothered to a e n contact, it's only we tiave n chasinq them. :l~morning a1sc­ ,r~~11~ three 1,mos, f;pokc'wit,lf their Sales Maniigor/ Coordinator and Service Manager. We are informed that the service contract has been f inally received by them. They said they will deliver the product today but upon our repeatedly asking about what time, they have not been able to give us a time. I gue...