Search Results

1. 2022-03-08-Minute-re-General-Information-Disclosure-No-1.pdf [pdf, 136 KB]

   ...role and processes of hospital following the attack/during the immediate response? 38 Did CDHB appropriately activate and use emergency polices? 39 Was there coordination in preparing to respond to a terrorist attack and coordination of emergency services? 40 What is the reason for discrepancies between time of death and mobile communications? 41 What is the reason for inconsistencies in the timeline of the shootings? 42 Not all families have been given information such as the DVI...

2. K Ltd v UD [2024] NZDT 568 (15 July 2024) [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...UD’s claim: Was the pool base prepared and placed with reasonable care and skill, and was the placement fit for the purpose? 16. By virtue of sections 28 and 29 of the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 (CGA), K Ltd was required to carry out all services it supplied to UD with reasonable care and skill and so that they were reasonably fit for the purpose. In this case that included K Ltd’s preparation of the base and the placing of the pool into the excavated hole. The standard requ...

3. T Ltd v O Inc [2025] NZDT 169 (13 February 2025) [pdf, 124 KB]

   ...O Inc liable to T Ltd for the losses arising from the failure of the vehicle engine, and if so, for how much? Did O Inc carry out the initial assessment of the car with reasonable care and skill? 8. The O Inc provides a roadside assistance service, the purpose of which is to try to assist drivers to carry on with their journey where possible, and arrange towing to a nearby garage where this is not possible. This work is done on the sides of roads across the country. 9. What is...

4. N Ltd v SQ & TQ [2023] NZDT 314 (25 July 2023) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...TQ the sum of $5,863.31 on or before 16 August 2023. 2. The claim by N Ltd is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In 2021, N Ltd was asked to, and provided, a quote to SQ and TQ (“the respondents”) for architectural concept and building consent services for a proposed new build in [Town]. 2. From June 2021 up to September 2022, N Ltd did work on the project. The respondents paid various invoices issued by N Ltd during that time. The respondents cancelled the contract in September...

5. [2020] NZEmpC 230 Arachchige v Rasier New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 398 KB]

   ...drivers (the Driver App). It describes itself as a “technology business” with its value being in the lead generation software application it provides and the related “Uber” brand. It says its Uber App “connects people who need transport services with people who provide transport services”. Anyone can download either or both Apps but before a driver can use the Driver App they must enter into a services agreement with UBER. Under the standard services agreement UBER ag...

6. HT v IU [2021] NZDT 1329 (13 April 2021) [pdf, 206 KB]

   ...any court or tribunal, is concerned with the enforcement of contracts, not interfering with them. It is not for this tribunal to rescue people from possibly bad bargains they may have entered into, including the price charged for the provision of services. 7) However, and that said, from the abovementioned starting point, or ‘first principle,’ there is an exception, and that is provided for in s.19 of the Act. If a term of a contract, including as to price, is ‘harsh or unconsci...

7. DG Ltd v ID Ltd [2020] NZDT 1441 (24 August 2020) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...which was accepted unchanged. An apparent acceptance that changes the offer is actually a counter-offer, which must then in turn be accepted unchanged before a legally binding contract arises. There must be an exchange of items of value, for example, services in exchange for money, which is known by the technical legal term “consideration”. A contract can be oral, or written, or partly oral and partly written. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 5 5. The correct way under th...

8. DQ Ltd v SM Ltd [2022] NZDT 6 (18 November 2021) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...under this demand. [3] The parties have a long history of dispute and there have been a number of Tribunal and other legal proceedings prior to this application. The parties had a previous business relationship. The applicant provided legal executive services to the respondent till 2019. By early 2019 the parties had fallen into dispute over amounts invoiced by the applicant leading to the applicant filing a claim in the Disputes Tribunal on 23 December 2019. The applicant claimed recover...

9. TD v KH [2023] NZDT 183 (18 April 2023) [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...statement is made, including the nature and subject-matter of the transaction and the respective knowledge of the parties, is relevant. 9. Prior to the purchase TD asked on [website] “Anything wrong with it”, and received the response “ No been serviced every 120,000kms. Parts have been replaced when needed…”. KH emailed TD a video he had taken of the underneath of the ute which showed there was some rust on the underside of the ute. In the video KH described the rust as “...

10. OIA-111267.pdf [pdf, 1.6 MB]

    ...justice.govt.nz/about/official-information-act-requests/oia-responses/. If you are not satisfied with this response, you have the right to make a complaint to the Ombudsman under section 28(3) of the Act. The Office of the Ombudsman may be contacted by email to info@ombudsman.parliament.nz or by phone on 0800 802 602. Nāku noa, nā Kelvin Watson Deputy Secretary, Corporate Services RE LE AS ED U ND ER T HE O FF IC IA L IN FO RM AT IO N AC T...