Search Results

1. NB v CF & MF [2024] NZDT 515 (13 August 2024) [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...They agreed to reduce the purchase price to $365,000 in light of ‘the work in the building report and … for the septic tank to be cleaned and a certificate provided showing that prior to settlement’. 7. CF and MF said they engaged M from I Services to clean the septic tank. M said there was no certificate that he knew of that he could provide, so instead he confirmed in an email: “To whom it may concern, We visited [address] twice in the week of 26th - 30th October. The fi...

2. YA & AZ v BT [2024] NZDT 765 (22 November 2024) [pdf, 118 KB]

   ...Whineray adjourned the hearing in June 2024 to allow the parties to serve notices under the Fencing Act in relation to the hedge separating the properties. Since then, Referee Whineray had to recuse herself, and the proceeding continued before me. The service of Fencing Act notices did not resolve this matter and it is for the Tribunal to resolve this dispute. 6. AZ and YA withdrew at the hearing on 21 November the part of their claim that related to the removal of the fence (adjoining...

3. KD v M Ltd [2024] NZDT 363 (11 June 2024) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...discharged her onus of proving that it was more likely than not that LM rushed her. 16. I do not consider that LM remarking that KD’s shape was larger around her tummy than around her boobs to have been rude or in breach of the guarantee to provide service with reasonable care and skill contained in s.28 of the CGA. If it was not factual that might be a breach but, while I have never been in attendance for the fitting of a bridal dress, comments by the salesperson as to the size of...

4. FT v BF Ltd [2023] NZDT 793 (20 December 2023) [pdf, 231 KB]

   ...was necessary for the remedial work and has not returned to address these items. 2. FT claims the sum of $21,000.00 for the cost of remedial work. 3. BF Ltd counterclaims the sum of $20,602.50 for damage to its reputation, reimbursement for services done outside of warranty scope, stress, and the removal of an unlicensed veranda at the property. 4. The issues to be determined are as follows: a. Are there defects in the any of the following: paint work, bath, or footpath block...

5. FC v QK [2024] NZDT 415 (14 May 2024) [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...the problem preventing the [ventilation] system from working properly was a faulty controller. Was QK entitled to an opportunity to remedy and if so, has he had that opportunity? 16. The Consumer Guarantees Act (CGA) applies. A supplier of a service is required to carry out the work with reasonable care and skill (S.28 CGA). The product of the service must be fit for the particular purpose made known by the consumer (S.29 CGA). 17. If there has been a failure to comply with one o...

6. Christchurch Masjidain Attack Inquiry

   If the information you're looking for isn't on this page, or if you have any other questions, please contact Coronial Services by emailing coronial.response@justice.govt.nz or phoning 0800 88 88 20. Media representatives should email queries to media@justice.govt.nz. Further information for media is available under the media tab. On these pages, you'll find information about the 15 March 2019 Christchurch Masjidain Attack Coronial Inquiry, and how the coronial process works....

   Located in:

   1. Coroners Court

7. [2023] NZIACDT 9 - WS v Lawlor (23 March 2023) [pdf, 318 KB]

   ...28 November, the complainant asked him by text whether the assessment results were available. He said that day they should have them in a couple of days. [26] On 9 December 2019, the complainant texted Mr Lawlor saying she had been trying to phone him since the previous Thursday. She asked for an update on NZQA’s assessment. He replied that day to say they were waiting for the assessment. There were problems on NZQA’s website. On 11 December, he said he would call back. Sh...

8. [2019] NZEmpC 192 Johnson v Chief of the New Zealand Defence Force [pdf, 394 KB]

   ...hacked his account; she had responded that the email was sent from his private phone and was not a NZDF responsibility. She recorded that she had gone on to tell him she would require proof that his account had been hacked. [23] Mr Johnson then phoned his brother who was involved in the IT industry. He told Mr Johnson that the words “On Behalf Of” were a major red flag for spoofed emails. Mr Johnson then approached Group Captain Woon pointing this out and stating that the e...

9. CAC 10054 v Hume [2013] NZREADT 91 [pdf, 252 KB]

   ...obtain from the defendant the said $20,000 deposit cheque which should have been paid into the employer’s trust account. [10] On 17 May 2011 Mr W worked at X Wanganui as its licensed agent. He said that at 9.39 am that day he answered the telephone and immediately recognised the voice of the defendant who, inter alia, threatened to kill him and his staff and then hung up. Mr W produced Telecom evidence of such a telephone call as coming from the defendant’s telephone number. Mr...

10. Canterbury Westland Standards Committee v Horne [2016] NZLCDT 36 [pdf, 491 KB]

    ...of the confirmation date (made on the morning of 23 June) was declined by the vendor. The vendor, through their solicitor, stated that there would be no agreement if confirmation were not provided by 4pm that day. 20. Mr Horne then contacted M by phone and stated that he could purchase the T property as nominee for S and A, hold it for them pending approval of the KiwiSaver application, then on- sell it to them at the original purchase price. Mr Horne advised that he would require payme...