Search Results

1. [2022] NZEmpC 192 E Tū Inc v Rasier Operations BV [pdf, 483 KB]

   E TŪ INCORPORATED v RASIER OPERATIONS BV [2022] NZEmpC 192 [25 October 2022] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZEmpC 192 EMPC 230/2021 IN THE MATTER OF a declaration under s 6(5) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 BETWEEN E TŪ INCORPORATED First Plaintiff AND FIRST UNION INCORPORATED Second Plaintiff AND RASIER OPERATIONS BV First Defendant AND UBER PORTIER BV Second Defendant AND UBER BV

2. LCRO 241/2014 GS v YF (26 June 2018) [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...required a consideration of what duties Mr GS owed to Mr YF. [3] It is also relevant to this complaint that the registered office of DFL was at Mr GS’ office and the loan documentation also provided that Mr GS’ office was the address for service of any Notices to be served on the guarantors. 2 Background [4] DFL was the trustee of the GHI Trust which was the owner of a farm in [town]. [5] DFL had a single director, Mr JM, who was the accountant for Mr and Mrs YF snr....

3. TG v H Ltd [2019] NZDT 1338 (25 October 2019) [pdf, 304 KB]

   ...The Tribunal orders: 1. H Ltd is the owner of the mare “K”. 2. H Ltd is to pay to TG the sum of $1,805.36 on or before Friday, 15 November 2019. Reasons 1. In January 2015, TG paid a stud fee of $2,702.50 to H Ltd (the company) for a service by the stallion “D” for her mare “TT” (“T”). The semen was shipped to a stud in Palmerston North for insemination. T did not fall pregnant. Since then, the company has supplied two other mares (“N” and “K”) both o...

4. OIA-108159.pdf [pdf, 2.8 MB]

   ...document 2: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Publications/Regulatory- Impact-Statement-Removing-taxpayer-funding-for-section-27-reports_FINAL.pdf • Regarding documents 3, 5 and 6: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Publications/Proactive-release-Legal-Services- Amendment-Bill_FINAL.pdf S9(2)(a) S9(2)(a) S9(2)(a) Please note that this response, with your personal details removed, may be published on the Min is try website at: justice. govt. nz/about/official-information-act-req u...

5. Director of Proceedings v Health New Zealand [2025] NZHRRT 15 [pdf, 388 KB]

   ...exercises its jurisdiction and issues: A declaration pursuant to section 54(1)(a) of the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 (“the Act”) that the defendant has breached the Health and Disability Commissioner (Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights) Regulations 1996 (“the Code”) in respect of Right 4(1) by failing to provide services to the aggrieved person with reasonable care and skill. [3] In the consent memorandum the parties also seek a final order...

6. Legal aid disbursement policy review response - July 2012 [pdf, 317 KB]

   ...Foreword The Ministry of Justice recently reviewed its legal aid disbursement policy. The review was part of a range of changes being made to the legal aid system which aim to make the legal aid system more sustainable, improve the quality of services provided and better match taxpayer funding to New Zealander’s legal aid needs. The aim of the disbursement policy review was to simplify and streamline processes to make it easier for providers and staff to manage claims, improve c...

7. LCRO 246/2013 YM v RD (7 January 2019) [pdf, 221 KB]

   ...the agreement, Mr YM instructed Mr RD to act on the purchase. [6] Mr YM was to arrange for a builder to provide a report. [7] On 25 September 2012, the day before the builder’s report condition was to be satisfied, Mr RD’s secretary, Ms HN, phoned Mr YM and enquired about his progress with obtaining a report from a builder. [8] A number of things happened on 26 September 2012, starting with Mr YM replying to Ms HN by email at 12.51 pm saying: Sorry I haven’t gotten back to y...

8. [2024] NZEnvC 158 Auckland Council v Eco Earth Limited [pdf, 267 KB]

   ...Manuel-Barbarich, Compliance Officer, Auckland Council. The Site [5] Mr Bruu describes the Site1 as being located on the southern edge of the former Greenmount Landfill. • The majority of the Site’s southern boundary is shared with the Mobil Service Station (30 Smales Road). The eastern part of the southern boundary is shared with a car dealer (36 Smales Road). • The western boundary is with the Greenmount Landfill and is formed by a substantial timber pole retainin...

9. KK & PM v S Ltd & SH Ltd [2023] NZDT 43 (23 January 2023) [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...PM qualify as consumers under the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 because they purchased a service for their personal or domestic needs from an entity that is in trade providing a service of that description. Section 28 of the Act provides that where services are supplied to a consumer, there is a guarantee that the service will be carried out with reasonable care and skill. 10. KK and PM provided two screenshots from the advertising on S Ltd’s website that “nobody wants to live in...

10. OIA-104489.pdf [pdf, 2.3 MB]

    ...justice.govt.nz/about/official-information-act-requests/oia-responses/. If you are not satisfied with this response, you have the right to make a complaint to the Office of the Ombudsman under section 28(3) of the Act. The Office of the Ombudsman may be contacted by email to info@ombudsman.parliament.nz or by phone on 0800 802 602. Nāku noa, nā Sam Kunowski General Manager, Courts, and Justice Services Policy Documents for release Number Document Type Document...