Search Results

1. W Ltd v X Ltd [2025] NZDT 6 (14 January 2025) [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...The Tribunal orders: 1. W Ltd and/or OT are to pay X Ltd $30,000 on or by 14 February 2025. Reasons 2. W Ltd is a company set up to be a franchisee for X Ltd’s business system, which provides cleaning, gardening, and other household services. OT is W Ltd’s director and guarantor. 3. On 1 September 2023, W Ltd entered into a franchise agreement (the Agreement) with X Ltd for house cleaning, and carpet and upholstery cleaning. 4. On 6 October 2023, the franchise commenc...

2. BR & SR v LD & BD [2023] NZDT 740 (4 December 2023) [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...though there had been agreement in principle, there was no agreement in any detail, and thus no agreement for the purposes of the Fencing Act. 6. The process of dispute resolution when agreement is not reached that the Act provides requires the service of Fencing Act notices and counter-notices within required timeframes (sections 10 and 11 of the Act). Some attempts to comply with the process were made but these were not sufficient to give the Tribunal any opportunity to make any ord...

3. BQ & DQ v I Ltd [2025] NZDT 133 (28 March 2025) [pdf, 206 KB]

   ...costs were $26,000.00 per month in late 2023. 13. In support of their overhead costs, I Ltd has provided an overview of operating costs for the 5 months from September 2023 to January 2024. While some types of overheads increase with the extent of services provided to clients, e.g. motor vehicle expenses, others are simply the costs of running a business and are incurred whether the business has projects on the go or not. I do not consider it reasonable in the circumstances that BQ and...

4. OIA-123011.pdf [pdf, 866 KB]

   ...Official Information Act responses | New Zealand Ministry of Justice If you are not satisfied with this response, you have the right to make a complaint to the Ombudsman under section 28 of the Act. The Office of the Ombudsman may be contacted by phone on: 0800 802 602, by email at: info@ombudsman.parliament.nz, or via the webform: Make a complaint (for members of the public) | Ombudsman New Zealand Nāku noa, nā Eve Padgett Acting Group Manager, Courts & Tribunals, Regional Serv...

5. LCRO 35/2017 QK v JF and EG (29 May 2019) [pdf, 259 KB]

   ...review, I acquired a thorough understanding of the conveyancing transaction, and the circumstances leading up to the firm being instructed to finalise the settlement. [8] Ms QK lodged her complaints with the New Zealand Law Society Complaints Service (Complaints Service) on 8 August 2016. [9] In the comprehensive submissions filed by the parties in support of and responding to the complaint and the review applications, there is a considerable degree of overlap with Ms K’s comp...

6. [2012] NZEmpC 97 Doran v Crest Commercial Cleaning Ltd [pdf, 224 KB]

   ...he needed the income and was unconcerned who his new employer would be in relation to that work. [13] On Monday 20 July 2009, Ms Williams spoke to Ms Robertson who told her that the incoming contractor was Crest and gave her Mr Bailey’s telephone number. Ms Williams said that Mr Doran wished to transfer to the new contractor and Ms Robertson said she was happy for him to continue cleaning Tonkin & Taylor’s premises for Crest. Following that conversation, Ms Williams wrot...

7. LCRO 68/2019 NI v RC and OD (28 February 2020) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...to review the Standards Committee determination.) [23] The final paragraph of Miss NI’s general comments on review read: “… Mr RC did not follow my instructions, furthermore I could never get ahold [sic] of him and he then withdrew his services right at pivotal point and lost my case”. [24] The outcome Miss NI seeks is to have the “fees wiped” and apologies from both Mr RC and Mr OD. Review [25] A hearing took place in Auckland on 4 February 2020 with Miss NI who was...

8. MLC 2019 October National Pānui [pdf, 383 KB]

   Contents: Applications for hearing in OCTOBER | WHIRINGA-Ä-NUKU 2019: ISSN 1175 - 8120 (Print) ISSN 2463-3763 (Online) www.mäorilandcourt.govt.nz www.mäorilandonline.govt.nz OCTOBER | WHIRINGA-Ä-NUKU 2019 The purpose of the National Pänui / Te Pänui ä Motu is to provide notice to interested parties of hearings being conducted in, and applications received by, the Mäori Land Court. Only applications and sittings that were confi rmed at the time of this publication are listed. F

9. Devillers v CAC303 & Ors [2015] NZREADT 38 [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...Devillers by Ms Watkins and Mr Rakich. This provided that the sale range was possible between $720,000 and $745,000. Ms Devillers says that orally she was assured that a figure in excess of $750,000 was likely. [5] Ms Devillers was not happy with the service that she received. Her complaints in summary are as follows. This is a summary of her written and oral evidence: (a) Poor Service:  Ms Devillers complained that the advertisements which were placed by Ray White contained a...

10. Harvey v CAC 10063 & Kelsall [2012] NZREADT 21 [pdf, 114 KB]

    ...Licensee as at mid- October [2010] when the article was published and it remained thus for approximately three weeks after publication. Being upset about the publication, the complainant discussed it with the Licensee and Ray White Mapua withdrew its services. The complainant then listed her property with Harcourts. 3.7 She contends that when she subsequently listed her property with Harcourts, the Licensee told her to “go and list with Harcourts. Go and list with your dumb fri...