ZT v UU [2025] NZDT 210 (8 July 2025) [pdf, 192 KB]
...repudiated the contract and did not intend to complete all work by the required date. I am satisfied that ZT is therefore entitled to cancel – s36 Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 (CCLA). I note that this contract was principally for the provision of services and therefore the exclusion contained in s59 CCLA (relating to contracts for sale of goods) does not apply. If ZT is entitled to cancel, what damages is she entitled to recover? 14. UU has repudiated the contract and ZT...