Search Results

1. ENV-2016-AKL-000188 Lenihan v Auckland Council [pdf, 3.4 MB]

   ...(j) An electronic copy of this notice is being served today by email on the Auckland Council at unitaryplan@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz. Waivers and directions have been made by the Environment Court in relation to the usual requirements of the RMA as to service of this notice on other persons. (k) I attach the following documents to this notice: (a) A copy of the relevant decision. (b) Any other documents necessary for an adequate understanding of the appeal; mailto:unitaryplan...

2. The Māori Trustee v Smith - Waipaoa 5A2 (2017) 72 Tairāwhiti MB 57 (72 TRW 57) [pdf, 546 KB]

   ...along with someone who she said was her mother, came into our Gisborne office and demanded to see my ID, a copy of our licnese and a copy of the email work order that I had been sent in order to carry out service. 13. My office administrator phoned Private Investigations 2017 in Rotorua and was told by our principal, to request Kreslea to write down her concerns and that she would forward those to Private Investigations 2017 in Rotorua for reply. 72 Tairawhiti MB 73 14. Kres...

3. ENV-2016-AKL-000201 Progressive Enterprises Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 4.2 MB]

   ...Council's decision on the Recommendation ("Decision") on 19 August 2016. Parts of the Decision that Progressive is appealing 4. Progressive appeals that part of the Decision relating to minimum parking rates for retail and commercial services in the Metropolitan Centre, Town Centre, Local Centre and Mixed Use zones. Reasons for appeal Parking minimums 5. The Council Decision rejects the Panel's Recommendation for minimum parking rates for retail and commercia...

4. Marshall v IDEA Services Ltd (HDC Act) [2020] NZHRRT 9 [pdf, 434 KB]

   IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2020] NZHRRT 9 Reference No. HRRT 041/2018 UNDER THE HEALTH AND DISABILITY COMMISSIONER ACT 1994 BETWEEN EAMON HENNING MARSHALL PLAINTIFF AND IDEA SERVICES LIMITED DEFENDANT AT NAPIER BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson Ms GJ Goodwin, Deputy Chairperson Ms LJ Alaeinia JP, Member Mr MJM Keefe QSM JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr GW Marshall as agent for his son Ms I Reuv...

5. [2007] NZEmpC WC 10/07 Nola & Anor v Harvey [pdf, 43 KB]

   ...Nola and Mr Smith trading as D M Transport. No statement in reply was received to that. [5] In spite of directions from the presiding Authority member and other communications from the Authority support staff, including a notice of hearing and phone calls, there was no appearance for the employers at the investigation meeting which proceeded on 5 October 2006 in their absence. [6] The Authority issued its determination on 9 October 2006 at which time the 28 days for filing a chal...

6. WU v QD [2021] NZDT 1613 (27 July 2021) [pdf, 270 KB]

   ...remedy. He simply could not envisage that he had misrepresented the caravan to WU. WU explained that the quotes he obtained were from a specialist who could do the work on the caravan. He says he was limited regarding the availability of such a service provider locally in [Town B]. I find that WU has proven a loss and that it is reasonable in the circumstances. QD must therefore pay WU $10, 722.60. Referee: S. P. Kane Date: 27 July 2021. Page 5 of 5...

7. HB Ltd v NH & KX [2017] NZDT 1452 (11 April 2017) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...for his own vehicles, though he disputed the amounts. He did not advance any reason for his dispute and chose to leave the hearing after a short period. 13. BB also claimed the cost of recovery of the debt, as set out in an invoice from Credit Services (NZ) Limited for $550.92. BB’s ability to recover such costs arises because of its contractual terms with its customers, who agree to pay the costs incurred when debts are unpaid by the due date. Because KX and BB had not signed the...

8. UW v GC Ltd [2024] NZDT 245 (17 March 2024) [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 245 APPLICANT UW RESPONDENT GC Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. UW purchased a [boat] from GC Ltd on 12 May 2023 for $130,000.00. The boat was to be cleaned and serviced before delivery. 2. UW states he started an 8 week, $25,000.00, “cosmetic makeover” of the boat. UW identified a crack at the base of the driver’s seat. UW contacted GC Ltd about the issue but refused to return the boat to...

9. BU and others v KC [2021] NZDT 1712 (13 December 2021) [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...of the lease to allow KC exclusive use of her portion of land. If the applicant’s breached that underlining term, then it follows that KC would need to prove her right by engaging a surveyor. That is what occurred, and KC incurred a fee for that service. The survey plan was most helpful for the determination of this dispute and to prove that the letterboxes infringed KC’s right to exclusive use. As I am satisfied that the applicant’s failed to prove they were entitled to have the let...

10. HC v X Ltd [2023] NZDT 391 (13 September 2023) [pdf, 207 KB]

    ...permit, resource consent, or building consent required by law”. 5. NN, director of X Ltd, considered a building consent was not required because the existing bathrooms were only renovated prior to the sale and there was no movement of the water services. 6. ND, a senior building consent officer with the [Council], attended as a witness. He said that the replacement of a shower is building work that always needs Council consent, or a request for exemption from obtaining consent...