BF v CV LCRO 271 / 2012 (6 September 2013) [pdf, 130 KB]
...perceiving the situation as becoming confrontational and causing his client anxiety, the Practitioner elected to depart, adding that Mr BF had called him a “wanker”6 as he left the room. The Practitioner wrote that he had only charged for services rendered to the father or the Family Trust. [11] The Practitioner also commented on a timeline of events that had been provided by Mr BF, and with particular reference to an email sent to the Practitioner on 29 June in the name of...