Search Results

1. T Ltd v N Ltd [2025] NZDT 26 (9 April 2025) [pdf, 167 KB]

   ...provided CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 6 a copy of what it says is L Ltd’s standard contract that was in force in 2023 when N Ltd purchased L Ltd’s business. 7. N Ltd has a standard property management agreement that covers the services it provides its clients. N Ltd suggests that once it took over managing T Ltd’s properties the terms of its standard contract applied to the arrangement with T Ltd. N Ltd has provided the Tribunal with a copy of its standard propert...

2. OIA-120631.pdf [pdf, 794 KB]

   ...Zealand Ministry of Justice If you are not satisfied with this response, you have the right to make a complaint to the Ombudsman under section 28 of the Act. The Office of the Ombudsman may be contacted by email to info@ombudsman.parliament.nz or by phone on 0800 802 602. Nāku noa, nā Jacquelyn Shannon Group Manager, Courts & Tribunals, Regional Service Delivery https://www.justice.govt.nz/about/official-information-act-requests/oia-responses/ Table 1: Number of convicted...

3. OIA-120181.pdf [pdf, 843 KB]

   ...media@justice.govt.nz If you are not satisfied with this response, you have the right to make a complaint to the Ombudsman under section 28(3) of the Act. The Office of the Ombudsman may be contacted by email to info@ombudsman.parliament.nz or by phone on 0800 802 602. Nāku noa, nā Jacquelyn Shannon Group Manager, Courts and Tribunals, Regional Service Delivery https://www.justice.govt.nz/about/official-information-act-requests/oia-responses/ Table 1: Total number of cases...

4. The Judges

   ...role she resolved employment relationship problems by investigating and determining matters for which the Authority has jurisdiction under the Employment Relations Act 2000 until December 2024.    ContactPeter GushPeter.Gush@justice.govt.nz Phone: 04 473 1679Mobile: 027 839 1617 Back to top

   Located in:

   1. Employment Court >
   2. About the Employment Court

5. LCRO 243/2016 KE v HO (21 June 2019) [pdf, 272 KB]

   ...complied with it. If she did not, her conduct may be unsatisfactory pursuant to s 12(c) of the Act. [36] In forming a view, it is important to remember the purposes of the Act, which are:5 (a) to maintain public confidence in the provision of legal services and conveyancing services: (b) to protect the consumers of legal services and conveyancing services: 3 Deliu v Hong [2012] NZHC 158, [2012] NZAR 209 at [39]–[41]. 4 Deliu v Co...

6. INZ (Calder) v Ji [2019] NZIACDT 50 (19 July 2019) [pdf, 246 KB]

   ...once they decided to proceed, in breach of cl 18(a); (2) failing to take personal responsibility for client engagement, obtaining instructions or establishing the client relationship, and allowing unlicensed individuals to provide immigration services, in breach of cls 1, 2(e) and 3(c); (3) providing information to Immigration New Zealand which was false, misleading or forged on behalf of four clients, thereby being negligent or alternatively being in breach of cls 1 and 31(a); a...

7. Auckland Waikato and Eastern Fish and Game Councils [pdf, 504 KB]

   ...this Appeal. …………………………………… B Wilson ON BEHALF OF THE AUCKLAND/WAIKATO FISH AND GAME COUNCIL …………………. A Garrick ON BEHALF OF THE EASTERN FISH AND GAME COUNCIL 4 Address for service of Appellant: Mr Ben Wilson Chief Executive Auckland Waikato Fish & Game Council 156 Brymer Road, RD9, Hamilton Email: BWilson@fishandgame.org.nz Phone: 07 849 1666 Fax: 07 849 1648 https://www.google.co.nz/maps?q=15...

8. Ministerial Advisory Group for Victims of Retail Crime - Final Report on Shoplifting [pdf, 390 KB]

   ...0 The status-quo’s inefficiency undermines its workability. At the more-serious end of offending, efficiency challenges are exacerbated by the fact that defendants can opt for a jury trial for relatively low-value shoplifting (e.g. theft of a phone valued at $1000), when this is not likely to result in materially different sentencing outcome than putatively low-value theft (e.g. two instances of theft of phones each valued at $500). Workability 0 The workability of the status-quo...

9. [2020] NZEmpC 63 Southern Taxis Ltd v A Labour Inspector [pdf, 518 KB]

   ...Both Mr and Mrs Grant said they deducted PAYE and not withholding tax because that is what they thought they were being asked to do. [10] In September 2007, Mr and Mrs Grant’s lawyers prepared a document, styled as a contract for taxi driving services. Curiously, it showed the principal as being Mr and Mrs Grant, trading as Southern Taxis, and not STL. The four drivers whose circumstances were considered by the Court did not sign this document, but its contents were said to re...

10. [2014] NZEmpC 233 Wills v Goodman Fielder NZ Ltd [pdf, 271 KB]

    ...enterprise which was subsequently transferred to Goodman Fielder. In December 1998, he became Bread Plant Manager at the Essex Street site. [5] In 2004, Goodman Fielder was incorporated, and Mr Wills became an employee of that company with his previous service being treated as continuous. [6] Goodman Fielder had two main divisions: the Baking Division, which produced bread products under the trade-name of Quality Bakers; and the Dairy Division which produced products under the tra...