ZF v XC LCRO 266/2013 (19 February 2015) [pdf, 103 KB]
...directions and instructions were not obtained from Mrs XC and her family. The firm’s response to the complaints [75] Mrs PE initially contacted Mr DM in the firm by telephone to advise of the family’s dissatisfaction with the firm’s services. She followed that with a letter dated 20 March 2012. No reply was received from Mr DM and she followed that with another letter dated 23 April 2012 requesting that Mrs XC be reimbursed for Ms MT’s fees. Again no response was r...