Search Results

1. [2025] NZIACDT 08 – JY v Wen (7 February 2025) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...visa application. [4] The adviser is Xinru Wendy Wen, a licensed immigration adviser. At the relevant time, she held a provisional licence and was engaged by NZvisa.com Ltd (the agency). She is now a director of NEO Education and Immigration Services Ltd, of Auckland. [5] The complainant contacted Ms Wen by WeChat text messaging on 28 February 2023 seeking assistance to come to New Zealand to work. He described himself as a truck and forklift driver, though had construction and...

2. Independent review of intelligence and security - call for submissions [pdf, 951 KB]

   ...submissions on the Government Communications Security Bureau and Related Legislation Amendment Bill 2013. These included:  Uncertainty over whether the definition covers metadata. Metadata is data about data – for example, the time and date of a phone call or email and the parties to it. It does not include the content of a communication, such as the body of an email.  Concern that what is considered “private”, and therefore protected from interception, could change over...

3. RV v IP and RM LCRO 212/2014 (25 July 2016) [pdf, 78 KB]

   ...KB, Ms CU and Mr RV, and notified the firm of each of the complaints. [13] On 4 February 2014 Ms OV, a co-director in, and a principal of, the firm, responded to the complaint on behalf of Ms KB.1 [14] Ms OV said that Ms CU had told Mr IP she was phoning on Ms KB’s behalf, because a prospective purchaser had contacted Mr RV and was interested in exploring whether the IPs might consider a pre-auction offer on the property. She says Ms KB first became aware of Mr RV’s involvement on...

4. LCRO Definitions [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...formal determination on the application from the evidence received. This determination is legally binding, sent to all parties, and may be published in a newspaper, journal, the Gazette or internet. Directions hearing (preliminary conference or phone conference) A meeting of all concerned parties, held at the direction of the LCRO. The aim is to speed up proceedings and ensure all parties are prepared. This may be by phone conference or in person. Discovery (or Disclos...

5. DC v C Ltd [2022] NZDT 274 (16 December 2022) [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...District Court [2022] NZDT 274 APPLICANT DC RESPONDENT C Ltd The Tribunal orders: DC is not liable to pay $907.50 to C Ltd. Reasons: 1. In November 2021, DC (the consumer) entered into a two-year contract with wireless internet service provider C Ltd (the supplier) for unlimited broadband and a landline at her rural property in [Address]. 2. When the consumer received her first monthly invoice, she disputed whether the supplier could charge GST on top of the ad...

6. RT v MX LCRO 284 / 2011 (12 October 2012) [pdf, 76 KB]

   ...debt. [4] The Applicant was representing himself and, according to the Practitioner, the two men were communicating directly by email and letters. Matters were not 2 progressing so the Practitioner was provided by his client with a contact phone number for the Applicant. After unsuccessfully ringing during the day he phoned him around 9:00 p.m. “with a view to ascertaining what the issue was with respect to the situation to see if any disputed matters could be resolved....

7. NN v C Ltd [2023] NZDT 410 (6 July 2023) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...NN RESPONDENT C Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In March 2023, NN purchased a [electric bike] from C Ltd in [City]. NN says the assurance from sales staff that the bike was also able to charge his phone was a critical factor in his purchase. NN quickly discovered however that phone charging could not occur. 2. NN claims $13,484.00 being, a refund of his purchase price of $11,484.00, and $2,000.00 for legal costs and his own time and in...

8. NN v C Ltd [2023] NZDT 410 (6 July 2023) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...NN RESPONDENT C Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In March 2023, NN purchased a [electric bike] from C Ltd in [City]. NN says the assurance from sales staff that the bike was also able to charge his phone was a critical factor in his purchase. NN quickly discovered however that phone charging could not occur. 2. NN claims $13,484.00 being, a refund of his purchase price of $11,484.00, and $2,000.00 for legal costs and his own time and in...

9. OIA-120297.pdf [pdf, 23 MB]

   National Office, Postal address: DX SX10088 | WELLINGTON Physical address: Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street | Thorndon| WELLINGTON 6011 W: www.pds.govt.nz 8 May 2025 Our ref: 120297 Dear Public Defence Service I refer to your email of 13 March 2025 to the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry) requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act) information relating to the Public Defence Service (PDS) expanding its capacity to take on more legal aid assignme...

10. READT - Response to charge [pdf, 244 KB]

    ...will be to your nominated person only. Name Company name (if applicable) Is your representative a lawyer? (Please tick one) Yes No (you will need to complete an ‘Authority to Act’ form available at www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals, or by phoning the Tribunal). Contact details Address for service (this cannot be a PO Box) Post code Daytime contact phone number ( ) Mobile Email address Part 4: Charge(s) Complaints Assessment Committee number Date of charge /...