Ratahi v CAC301 & Legge [2015] NZREADT 62 [pdf, 221 KB]
...no requirement that same be refunded to the vendor except subject to a Court order for some reason, or by a CAC or by us pursuant to s.93(e) of the Act (set out below). An agent who has breached s.126 must be able to sue for a reasonable fee for services performed on some type of quantum meruit basis.” [68] In the present appeal about penalty we accept, of course, that the defendant erred in not having a listing agreement signed in particular, and apparently in the appraisal being in...