Search Results

1. July 2016 National Pānui [pdf, 315 KB]

   Contents: Applications for hearing in MAY | HARATUA 2016: ISSN 1175 - 8120 (Print) ISSN 2463-3763 (Online) www.mäorilandcourt.govt.nz www.mäorilandonline.govt.nz JULY | HÖNGONGOI 2016 The purpose of the National Pänui / Te Pänui ä Motu is to provide notice to interested parties of hearings being conducted in, and applications received by, the Mäori Land Court. Only applications and sittings that were confi rmed at the time of this publication are listed. For more information,

2. Memorandum of Counsel for The Point 6 September 2018 [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   P O BOX 3798 AUCKLAND 1140 TELEPHONE +64 9 353 9700 FACSIMILE +64 9 353 9701 SOLICITOR ACTING: NATHAN HOLLIS nathan.hollis@minterellison.co.nz PARTNER RESPONSIBLE: BIANCA TREE bianca.tree@minterellison.co.nz BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA ENV-2018-AKL-000078 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of the direct referral of an application for resource consent for the necessary infrastructure and rela

3. Cole v Realty Insight Limited [2012] NZWHT Auckland 25 [pdf, 259 KB]

   ...would have sought to cancel. Page | 8 [16] On 2 October 2006 the NSCC issued a CCC for the property. Mr Xiang then contacted Ms Amm to see if the claimants were still interested in purchasing. [17] On 5 October 2006, Mr Cole telephoned his solicitors to seek advice on signing a second agreement for sale and purchase. The nature of that conversation and the advice received (if any) is in dispute. The claimants contend that they specifically sought and received...

4. Election Access Fund Evaluation Report (Accessible Version) [docx, 236 KB]

   Process evaluation of the Election Access Fund Act (2020): after the first use of the Fund August 2024 Pragmatica Report information Prepared for Minister of Justice and the Ministry of Justice Tāhū o te Ture Prepared by Judy Oakden, Pragmatica Limited Michelle Moss, Mimo Consulting Kellie Spee, Kellie Spee Consultancy Acknowledgements [bookmark: _Hlk173092871]We are grateful for the enthusiastic and candid participation that occurred in several ways, without which it wo

5. Process evaluation of the Election Access Fund Act (2020): after the first use of the Fund (Read only) [docx, 773 KB]

   [bookmark: _Hlk98165034] Process evaluation of the Election Access Fund Act (2020): after the first use of the Fund August 2024 Pragmatica Report information Prepared for Minister of Justice and the Ministry of Justice Tāhū o te Ture Prepared by Judy Oakden, Pragmatica Limited Michelle Moss, Mimo Consulting Kellie Spee, Kellie Spee Consultancy Acknowledgements [bookmark: _Hlk173092871]We are grateful for the enthusiastic and candid participation that occu

6. [2018] NZEnvC 111 Fright v Christchurch City Council [pdf, 7.8 MB]

   -- . BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 111 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act BETWEEN CHARMAINE SUSAN FRIGHT (ENV-2017 -CHC-76) Appellant AND CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J E Borthwick Environment Commissioner R M Dunlop Environment Commissioner C J Wilkinson Hearing: at Christchurch on 15 March 2018 Appearances: A Preb

7. IPT Practice Note 2/2024 Refugee and Protection [pdf, 512 KB]

   ...or courier, the time for appeal runs from delivery of the Refugee Status Unit decision to the person’s contact address; or (b) by email, the time for appeal runs from delivery of the Refugee Status Unit decision to the recipient’s internet service provider’s server or other server used for the receipt of email and it is presumed to have arrived the same day it was sent unless there is evidence available to indicate that it was not — see LJ (Skilled Migrant) [2018] NZIPT 20...

8. [2019] NZEnvC 189 508 Chapel Road Partnership Trust v Auckland Council [pdf, 2.2 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC \ ~ °\ of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal under s 120 of the Act 508 CHAPEL ROAD PARTNERSHIP TRUST (ENV-2018-AKL-000281) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J A Smith Date of Correction: 2 1 NOV 2019 Date of Issue: 2 1 NOV 2019 CORRECTION Introduction [1] This appeal was against a decision by Auckl

9. [2022] NZEnvC 247 Country Lifestyles Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 441 KB]

   Wedd et al IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision No. [2022] NZEnvC 247 IN THE MATTER an appeal under section 358 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (Act) AND applications for declarations under section 311 of the Act BETWEEN COUNTRY LIFESTYLES LIMITED (ENV-2021-AKL-000051) Appellant / Applicant INFOTECH ACCOUNTANTS LIMITED (ENV-2021-AKL-000149) C WEDD (ENV-2022-AKL-000001) Applicants AND AUCKLAND CO

10. [2017] NZEmpC 85 Ramkissoon v Commissioner of New Zealand Police [pdf, 668 KB]

    DANIEL SEAN RAMKISSOON v THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 85 [7 July 2017] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 85 ARC 60/12 proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN DANIEL SEAN RAMKISSOON Plaintiff AND THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE Defendant Hearing: Rotorua and Tauranga 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 26 and 27 August (Rotorua) and 11, 12 and 13 November (Tauranga) 2