Search Results

1. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Crampton [2015] NZHRRT 35 [pdf, 151 KB]

   ...the content of the written warning was true because of its official-seeming nature and its publication by the media. As a distance student representative her constituents could only read about her and make their judgment about her competence and service delivery based on what was in the media. There were about 17,000 students off-campus studying from a distance and they would only know about Ms Chapman from what they read. A deluge of emails from students followed. Some were in suppor...

2. OIA-106563.pdf [pdf, 3.6 MB]

   ...performance in core policing. I am advised that the purpose of the programme is to ensure Police have the capability and capacity to make better inf01med decisions to deliver principled, effective, and efficient resolution decisions and policing services. The programme includes longer term initiatives to improve evidential processes and practices to enable early disclosure. Demand-based court scheduling 14 The Chief District Court Judge implemented "demand-based court scheduling&...

3. 14.02.2023 Long Term Insights Briefing The Future of Imprisonment II FINAL [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   ...system 50 Appendix A: Population Survey Questionnaire 52 Appendix B ‘Opt-in’ Survey Questionnaire 53 Appendix C Long-term Briefing Consultation Document 54 Research New Zealand 5 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Public Service Chief Executives have a statutory requirement to engage with the general public in order to conduct a Long-term Insights Briefing. The justice sector public service agencies (Ministry of Justice; Ara Poutama Aotearoa; Oranga Tamariki...

4. Hart v Auckland Standards Committee 1 of the New Zealand Law Society [pdf, 515 KB]

   HART V AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 1 OF NEW ZEALAND LAW SOCIETY HC AK CIV- 2012-404-5076 THIS JUDGMENT IS SUBJECT TO THE SUPPRESSION ORDERS CONTAINED IN PARAGRAPH [246] IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV-2012-404-5076 CIV-2012-404-5528 BETWEEN BARRY JOHN HART Appellant AND AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 1 OF NEW ZEALAND LAW SOCIETY Respondent Hearing: 10 & 11 December 2012 Court: Winkelmann J Lang J Counsel: A Trenw

5. Berry & Ors as Trustees of the Burns Berry Trust v Lay [pdf, 301 KB]

   CLAIM NO: 00136 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN ELIZABETH WAUGH BERRY, DONALD JEFFREY WAUGH BURNS and CLAIRE MARIE RYAN as Trustees of the Burns Berry Trust Claimants AND No First or Second Respondents AND STEPHEN BRIAN LAY Third Respondent AND JESSOP TOWNSEND LIMITED Fourth Respondent AND AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL Fifth Respondent AND ARCHITECTURAL WATERPROOFING LIMITED (in Liq

6. Research on the effectiveness of police practice in reducing residential burglary part 1 [pdf, 451 KB]

   Research on the effectiveness of Police practice in reducing residential burglary Report 1 Surveys of household burglary Part One (2002): Four Police Areas and national data compared Sue Triggs December 2005 2 Research on the effectiveness of Police practice in reducing residential burglary Report 1: Surveys of Household Burglary part one (2002): Four Police Areas and national data compared, Dr Sue Triggs, Ministry of Justice, 2005. Report 2: Surveys of Household Burglary part two: F

7. Privacy Act 1993 and Privacy Act 2020

   A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z A Access order - application under Privacy Act 2020, s 104 to enforce access direction made under s 92 – whether access direction made against legally recognisable entity so that access order could be enforced – Privacy Act 2020, ss 92 and 104 Sheehan v Bad

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Human rights >
   3. Decisions - Index

8. Case studies from evaluation of court-referred restorative justice pilot [pdf, 791 KB]

   Evaluation of the Court-Referred Restorative Justice Pilot: Case Studies Prepared by the Crime and Justice Research Centre Victoria University of Wellington May 2005 2 DISCLAIMER This research was commissioned by the former Department for Courts. The report has been prepared by the authors and the views expressed in it are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the

9. Auckland District Law Society v Dorbu [2010] NZLCDT 9 [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...claiming damages from a company, W Properties Limited, whose director was Mr S. By early October 2004, although a statement of defence to the claim had been filed, the defendant’s solicitor had withdrawn. On 17 September 2004 Mr S had left a phone message for Mr G indicating he wished to discuss settlement. Mr G immediately sent a letter of reply by fax that day advising Mr S that Mr G was away on leave from 20 September to Friday 1 October and that Mr S could contact his ins...

10. ENV-2016-AKL-000277 Auckland Transport v KiwiRail Holdings Limited [pdf, 11 MB]

    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND RECEIVED 2 Q ,OV 2016 Envlronmenl Court Auckland ENV-2016-AKL- IN THE MATTER of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 (LGATPA) and the Resource Management Act AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal under section 157(1) of the LGATPA against a decision in relation to Designation 6303 BEnNEEN AUCKLAND AND TRANSPORT Appellant KIWIRAIL J-tOLDINGS LIMITED Respondent NOTICE OF APPEAL TO: The Registrar