Search Results

Search results for phone services.

4036 items matching your search terms

  1. [2019] NZEnvC 195 Clevedon North Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 11 MB]

    !BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA [2019] NZEnvC \ q 5 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of an appeal pursuant to s120 of the Act BETWEEN CLEVEDON NORTH LIMITED (ENV-2019-AKL-029) Applicant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J A Smith Commissioner R M Bartlett Hearing: 4 - 6 November 2019 Appearances: R E Bartlett QC for Clevedon North Limited S F Quinn for Auckland Council A Rennie for herself and J

  2. Research on the effectiveness of police practice in reducing residential burglary part 2: 2002 to 2004 [pdf, 537 KB]

    Research on the effectiveness of Police practice in reducing residential burglary Report 2 Surveys of household burglary Part Two: Four Police Areas Compared Between 2002 and 2004 Sue Triggs December 2005 2 Research on the effectiveness of Police practice in reducing residential burglary Report 1: Surveys of Household Burglary part Ooe (2002): Four Police Areas and national nata compared, Dr Sue Triggs, Ministry of Justice, 2005. Report 2: Surveys of Household Burglary part two: Four

  3. Rātima v Sullivan - The Tataraakina C Trust (2015) 41 Takitimu MB 102 (41 TKT 102) [pdf, 531 KB]

    41 Takitimu MB 102 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TĀKITIMU DISTRICT A20080006586 A20100012206 A20140005905 UNDER Sections 37, 231, 237,238 and 240 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF The Tataraakina C Trust BETWEEN HENARE TONGARIRO PUWAI RĀTIMA Applicant AND GEORGE SULLIVAN, HORO EDWARDS, IVY KAHUKIWA SMITH, JOHN WANO, AND TANIA HUATA KUPA AS TRUSTEES OF THE TATARAAKINA C TRUST Respondents Hearings: 12 T

  4. OIA-102423-v2.pdf [pdf, 2.2 MB]

    ...noted that the IPCA Act does not contain an equivalent of s 25 of the Ombudsmen Act. That section provides: 25 Proceedings not to be questioned or to be subject to review 2 Taylor v the Social Security Appeal Authority (2019] NZHC 1718; Financial Services Complaints ltd v Wakem (2016] NZHC 634. RE LE AS ED U ND ER T HE O FF IC IA L IN FO RM AT IO N AC T 19 82 No proceeding of an Ombudsman shall be held bad for want of form, and, except on the ground of lack of jur...

  5. OIA-102423.pdf [pdf, 2.2 MB]

    ...noted that the IPCA Act does not contain an equivalent of s 25 of the Ombudsmen Act. That section provides: 25 Proceedings not to be questioned or to be subject to review 2 Taylor v the Social Security Appeal Authority (2019] NZHC 1718; Financial Services Complaints ltd v Wakem (2016] NZHC 634. RE LE AS ED U ND ER T HE O FF IC IA L IN FO RM AT IO N AC T 19 82 No proceeding of an Ombudsman shall be held bad for want of form, and, except on the ground of lack of jur...

  6. Evaluation of Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment Court pilot [pdf, 1.3 MB]

    Formative Evaluation for the Alcohol and other Drug Treatment Court Pilot Prepared for Ministry of Justice 31 March 2014 F O R M A T I V E E V A L U A T I O N F O R T H E A L C O H O L A N D O T H E R D R U G T R E A T M E N T C O U R T P I L O T i i Contents Preface v Glossary vi 1. Executive summary 1 2. Introduction 9 2.1 Background 9 2.2 Formative evaluation of the AODT Court 9 2.3 Formative evaluation methodolog

  7. [2017] NZEmpC 95 Fraser v McDonalds and Doran v Carrick [pdf, 355 KB]

    ...inserted were other than those to which he agreed. [21] Insofar as the brochure containing the standard conditions is concerned, the following provisions relating to work scheduling and security of hours are relevant. Work scheduling As a fast service restaurant we experience periods of varying customer demand. Therefore our work schedules need to be flexible. However, as far as possible, our objective is to recognise the desire of staff to have more certainty over...

  8. 01.-Evidence-of-Mr-Lonnie-Dalzell-Waka-Kotahi-Project-Overview64017177.1.PDF [PDF, 855 KB]

    Barristers and Solicitors Wellington Solicitor Acting: David Allen / Thaddeus Ryan Email: david.allen@buddlefindlay.com / thaddeus.ryan@buddlefindlay.com Tel 64 4 044 620450 Fax 64 4 499 4141 PO Box 2694 DX SP20201 Wellington 6011 ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA ENV-2023-WLG-000005 Under the Resource Management Act 1991 In the matter of the direct referral of applications for res

  9. BMN v Stonewood Group Ltd [2024] NZHRRT 64 [pdf, 324 KB]

    (1) ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS, OCCUPATION AND OTHER IDENTIFYING DETAILS OF THE PLAINTIFF (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL OR OF THE CHAIRPERSON Reference No. HRRT 056/2020 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 2020 BETWEEN BMN PLAINTIFF AND STONEWOOD GROUP LIMITED DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Ms SJ Eyre, Chairperson Mr MJM Keefe QSM JP, Member Mr IR Nemani, Member REPRESENTATION Ms K Wilson an

  10. 2021-02-12 Willowridge Affidavit Alison Devlin Exhibit B [pdf, 25 MB]

    Queenstown Lakes District Council - Private Bag 50072 - Queenstown 9348 - Tel 03 441 0499 - www.qldc.govt.nz 1 2 3.1 Step 1 – Mandatory public notification 3.2 Step 2 – Public notification precluded 3 3.3 Step 3 – If not precluded by Step 2, public notification is required in certain circumstances 4 5 3.4 Step 4 – Public Notification in Special Circumstances 4.1 Step 1: certain affected groups and affected persons must be notified 4.2 Step 2: if not require