JK v OC LCRO 254/2013 (10 February 2015) [pdf, 93 KB]
...degree as to approach a level of impropriety which could properly be described as corruption. • Mr OC had advanced argument that various documents existed when that was not the case. • Mr OC had misled the Court in allowing evidence of cell phone records to be admitted, when he knew those records were misleading. [16] The Committee noted that Mr JK had referred the allegations, or similar allegations made against Mr OC to the Complaints Service and to a number of agencies in...