ZA v YB LCRO 23/2014 (31 August 2016) [pdf, 65 KB]
...Committee should have determined it by the exercise of its discretion under s 138(1)(c); 7 (b) The Committee made a fundamental error of fact by inferring from Mr [ZA]’s involvement in seeking to uplift the file that he was providing regulated services when he made a complaint about Mr [YB]’s conduct, because he made the complaint under his own name and was not acting on his client’s instructions; (c) As Mr [ZA] was not providing regulated services, he considers the Commi...