Search Results

1. OIA-102193.pdf [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...“I would like an explanation under Official Information Act as to why adjudicator tenancy and disputes tribunal hearings are not held in person since Covid restrictions have been lifted. The Tribunals as a lower justice court are being held by phone…” Tenancy Adjudicators and Disputes Tribunal Referees are independent Judicial officers and are solely responsible for how hearings are conducted. Information on the mode by which hearings may be conducted in the Disputes and Tenancy...

2. LA - Part 2 - Areas of Law Waitangi Tribunal [pdf, 777 KB]

   ...particular area of law. Work samples must be from the last five years. (Please remove or black out details in the sample that identify the client in the case) if you are only applying for approval as a lead provider or provider of specified legal services in this area of law, please only attach two of the following as samples of your work. these samples should be related to the case examples you have provided. if you are applying for approval as a lead provider or provider of specifie...

3. LO v SD [2021] NZDT 1388 (3 July 2019) [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...against Ms D? Was Ms D acting "in trade" when she facilitated Ms O’s purchase of air tickets? 7. I find that Ms D was not acting “in trade” as she is not in the business of making travel arrangements or providing travel agency services. She was simply asked by a friend to help book tickets using the same cheap contacts for airfares that she uses for her personal travel arrangements. 8. That means that Ms D has no liability under the Consumer Guarantees Act 199...

4. LC v DB [2023] NZDT 161 (2 June 2023) [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...binding agreement when they entered into the agreement. • one party to the contract made an offer and the other party accepted that offer. • the promises exchanged were for something of value - such as the promise of a party to provide goods or services, a promise to pay for goods or services, or the foregoing of a benefit (eg the forbearance to sue). CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 • the terms of the contract must be certain – it needs to be clear what the parties...

5. C Ltd & UC v BO [2024] NZDT 805 (19 September 2024) [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...costs, less the salvage cost of $675.00. 3. BO counterclaims $3,494.72 for repairs to his car. 4. BO attended the first hearing on 1 August 2024, but did not attend the in person hearing scheduled for today at 9.15am. I made two calls to his phone, however, they both went to answerphone. Therefore, the hearing proceeded in his absence. 5. The key issue to be decided is whether BO caused the collision by driving across the road in front of UC, or whether UC caused the collision b...

6. [2015] NZEmpC 62 Dynamic Meats 2014 v Hodges Allen [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...to serve Dynamic Meats and Mr Ashley (both had been cited as respondents). The Authority Member confirmed, and I accept, that the proceedings filed in the Authority were duly served on Dynamic Meats and Mr Ashley in accordance with the service provisions provided for in reg 16 of the Employment Relations Authority Regulations 2000 (the Regulations). [23] Regulation 16(2) requires the Authority to serve any document lodged with the Authority on the other party to the proce...

7. Online Final PO Information at Service Pack Respondent [pdf, 461 KB]

   ...who help people in your situation live without violence: • It’s Not OK: 0800 456 450 (9am-11pm everyday) or areyouok.org.nz • Shine: 0508 744 633 (9am-11pm everyday) or 2shine.org.nz For more (local) organisations visit: • familyservices.govt.nz/directory/ • nnsvs.org.nz/information/ If you want help to remove or change this Protection Order Talk to a lawyer or contact a Family Court office. You should talk to a lawyer who is familiar with the Family Violenc...

8. TB v X Ltd [2022] NZDT 133 (25 August 2022) [pdf, 135 KB]

   ...2022. He did not get a reply. (c) On 12 May 2022, TB sent KQ a text message. KQ replied on 13 May 2022, saying that the delivery date “looks like scheduled for 20th”. TB replied by text message to KQ, thanking him for his text and asking for a phone call. TB says there was no reply to that text and no phone call from KQ. (d) On 20 May 2022, TB attempted to contact KQ on several occasions about delivery. KQ did make one reply to TB on 20 May 2022 and said, “I’ll call B and s...

9. LCRO 113/2021 VN v [Area] Standards Committee [X] (27 June 2022) [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...the [Town C] Court on the morning of the 16th of September. He explained that he had set out from [Town D] with confident expectation that he would arrive at Court in time but had been delayed by roadworks. He explained that there was poor cell phone coverage on the route he travelled, but that in any event it was not his practice to use his cell phone when driving. On arrival at the [Town C] Court at around 9.04 am, Mr VN says he was informed by the Registrar that his application had...

10. Green v EIT [2020] NZHRRT 24 [pdf, 985 KB]

    ...personal or family relationships. He had continued to try to involve Ms Gillett-Jackson despite her asking him several times to stop. This happened also in the evenings and on weekends. [29.2] Jeremy was also contacting her on her personal cell phone number. It was usual practice to give students private cell phone numbers because EIT did not provide staff with work mobiles. Ms Gillett-Jackson had explained to Jeremy that he should not abuse the fact that he had her personal mobile n...