[2018] NZEmpC 85 Kaikorai Service Centre Ltd v First Union Inc [pdf, 407 KB]
...saved by applying s 24 of the Evidence Act. They are inadmissible. [58] The last paragraph of Mr Dawson’s evidence addressed in this application is [54], containing his opinion that union members have felt targeted, going on to say that some check-out operators have received anonymous customer complaints. The connection between those statements and the proceeding is not obvious. I accept Ms Swarbrick’s submission that this evidence is irrelevant and, in parts, hearsay. Apart...