Search Results

1. Supplementary Government Response to Law Commissions report [pdf, 479 KB]

   ...Complexity of the issues raised by a personal information request should be added to the grounds in section 41(1) on which an agency may extend the time limit for responding to a request. Not having enough time to carry out due process, including checks and balances, can be a contributing factor in privacy breaches. A consequential amendment should be made to section 15A of the Official Information Act. 32 Principle 12(2) should be redrafted so that the meaning of “assign” is clea...

2. Waitangi Tribunal - Part 2 The alienation of Māori land in Rohe Potae [pdf, 5.9 MB]

   , ~. , .. ~ 11 RANGAHAUA WHANUI DISTRICT 8 THE ALIENATION OF MAORI LAND IN THE ROHE POTAE (AOTEA BLOCK) PART 2: 1900 - 1960 CATHY MARR AUGUST 1999 WAITANGI TRIBUNAL RANGAHAUA WHANUI SERIES List of Contents f ' Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................. ill , ' Introduction •.••••••••.•.......•.•.....••...••..•.•..•.....•...•.•

3. Final Process Evaluation for the Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment Court 2016 [pdf, 2.3 MB]

   ...the court day can be further improved. The resource required to implement the AODT Court design was under- estimated, particularly in relation to: (1) the time required by the judges, court coordinators, case managers, peer support workers and police prosecutors; and (2) the number of places needed in supported accommodation. The workload pressure for case managers continues and is dependent on the size of their caseload and the number of their participants who are brought forward...

4. National and Auckland Standards Committees v Deliu [2016] NZLCDT 41 [pdf, 441 KB]

   NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2016] NZLCDT 41 LCDT 010/10, 008/12 and 014/15 IN THE MATTER OF The Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 and the Law Practitioners Act 1982 BETWEEN NATIONAL STANDARDS COMMITTEE No. 1 AND THE AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE No. 1 Applicant AND FRANCISC CATALIN DELIU of Auckland, Lawyer CHAIR Ms M Scholtens QC MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Ms S Hughes QC Ms J Gray Mr W Smith

5. [2024] NZEmpC 147 MW v Spiga Ltd [pdf, 740 KB]

   MW v SPIGA LIMITED [2024] NZEmpC 147 [8 August 2024] ORDER FOR NON-PUBLICATION OF INFORMATION CONTAINED AT [106] OF THIS JUDGMENT IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2024] NZEmpC 147 EMPC 20/2023 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN MW Plaintiff AND SPIGA LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 9–10 October 2023 (Heard

6. Final Submissions Summary Report [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   Crown/Māori Relations Summary of Submissions Te ara whakamua ā tātou Our path ahead Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully exclude

7. OIA-114187.pdf [pdf, 6.2 MB]

   ...work underway (Electoral reforms), while 2 projects are currently scheduled to start in 2024/ early 2025. A further 7 projects are scheduled for mid-2025 through to 2026. We will discuss these opportunities with you again at the end of the year to check on how they should precede in light of the delivery of the programme during 2024. Deferred projects and bills to be combined We are continuing work to identify projects that can be deferred 31. We are looking into what opportunities ar...

8. Hammond v Credit Union Baywide [2015] NZHRRT 6 [pdf, 265 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2015] NZHRRT 6 Reference No. HRRT 027/2013 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN KAREN MAY HAMMOND PLAINTIFF AND CREDIT UNION BAYWIDE DEFENDANT AT NAPIER BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms WV Gilchrist, Member Mr BK Neeson JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Ms KM Hammond in person supported by Ms J Gooding as McKenzie friend Mr AJ Harris and Mr GJC Ferguson for defendant DATE OF HE

9. Domestic Violence 1995 Act 42-day rule & Children, Young Persons and their Families Act 1989 60-day rule [pdf, 81 KB]

   The Domestic Violence 1995 Act 42 day ‘rules’, and the Children, Young Persons and Their Families Act 1989 60 day ‘rule’ A report commissioned by the Department for Courts June 2002 Helena Barwick and Alison Gray Disclaimer This research was commissioned by the Department for Courts. The report has been prepared by the authors and the views expressed in it are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department for Courts. Contents Summary......

10. [2012] NZEmpC 153 Hayllar v The Goodtime Food Co Ltd [pdf, 265 KB]

    ...with a full copy of the drugs policy. [29] In reference to the requirement for a second drugs test, Mr Pollett told the Court: ... I did say I wanted to retest him as he had suffered an accident over a loose tile. After my engineer and I checked the tile I concluded that it was unlikely to be the cause of him falling. I also noted that the witnesses to the fall said that he fell backwards while the box of onions he was carrying went forward. 45. Given the confusing rep...