Search Results

1. Independent Electoral Review Final Report Executive Summary and List of Recommendations [pdf, 655 KB]

   ...arrangements and international and domestic human rights obligations within which our electoral law must operate. This context informed our approach to the review and our recommendations. 7. Aotearoa New Zealand’s constitutional arrangements provide checks and balances by one branch of the government against another. Under Aotearoa New Zealand's constitutional arrangements, members of the executive must be members of parliament. This requirement gives the executive branch a power...

2. Constitutional Advisory Panel Full Report 2013 [pdf, 4.4 MB]

   New Zealand’s Constitution A Report on a Conversation He Kōtuinga Kōrero mō Te Kaupapa Ture o Aotearoa NOVEMBER 2013 NEW ZEALAND’S CONSTITUTION: A Report on a Conversation | He Kōtuinga Kōrero mō Te Kaupapa Ture o Aotearoa NEW ZEALAND’S CONSTITUTION: A Report on a Conversation | He Kōtuinga Kōrero mō Te Kaupapa Ture o Aotearoa New Zealand’s Constitution A Report on a Conversation He Kōtuinga Kōrero mō Te Kaupapa Ture o Aotearoa 1 NEW ZEALAND’S CONSTITUTION

3. Proactive release - Electoral Amendment Bill and Referendums Framework Bill [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   ...day enrolment without this funding. 18. I am also proposing a legislative change to extend the period for the Return of the Writ from 50 to 60 days. This additional time is needed due to the increased number of late enrolments that will need to be checked and verified after election day, together with the expected increase in special votes. The extension will allow extra time before the election to get voting information to voters, as well as extra time after the election to compl...

4. [2023] NZEnvC 003 Judgeford Environmental Society Incorporated v Wellington Regional Council [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...auditor; c. Site condition; d. Weather conditions; e. Sediment management (including identification of problem areas that are not being treated by sediment control measures, and any measures put in place to treat these areas); f. Runoff control (check of diversion channels and check sediment retention ponds); g. Condition of sediment control measures, including silt fences, contour drains and sediment retention ponds; h. Maintenance required and the date this will be completed b...

5. [2020] NZEnvC 122 Auckland Council v Auckland Council [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I MUA I TE KOOTI T AIAO O AOTEAROA Kl TAMAKI MAKAURAU IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC J Z. 2. of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s120 of the Act AUCKLAND COUNCIL (ENV-2017-AKL-190) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent I INGLIS, M G GREEN AND P SIMUNOVICH DR P H MITCHELL AND P MITCHELL DANOS HUNT P AND S LYNESS GSHAW P AND J STANSFIELD P KI

6. [2018] NZEnvC 101 Kumeu Properties Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 11 MB]

   ...should be a minimum maintenance period, and that a six month frequency is appropriate in the circumstances and agreed to by Mr Dillon Watson, their expert. [13] Given the complexity of the system, I consider that a reasonable minimum frequency for checking of the system should be once every six months, although it may be that the manufacturer recommends more frequent servicing. Given the requirement under clause 101 for a written maintenance contract, I consider that the contract may...

7. [2016] NZEmpC 48 Nelson v Katavich [pdf, 290 KB]

   MIA NELSON v TONY WAYNE KATAVICH NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2016] NZEmpC 48 [3 May 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2016] NZEmpC 48 CRC 13/2013 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN MIA NELSON Plaintiff AND TONY WAYNE KATAVICH First Defendant AND HALDEMAN LLC Second Defendant Hearing: 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 September 2015 and 14, 15, 16 and 17 March 2016 (

8. BOAC v Auckland Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 50-57 [pdf, 357 KB]

   Page | 1 IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI 2010-100-32, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 and 41 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56 and 57 BETWEEN BOAC Claimants AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL First Respondent AND HUGHES & TUKE CONSTRUCTION LTD Second Respondent AND DAVID CHARLES TUKE Third Respondent AND DAVID B MCGLASHAN Fourth Respondent AND RRL GROUP LIMITED Fifth Respondent AND BARRY RUSSELL BROWN (Undischarged Bankrupt) Si

9. [2018] NZEnvC 116 Kumeu Property Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 8 MB]

   [BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC f /6 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act KUMEU PROPERTY LIMITED (ENV-2017 -AKL-044) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge JA Smith, sitting alone pursuant to s 279, in chambers at Auckland Counsel: RE Bartlett QC for Kumeu Property Limited D Hartley and M Matich for Auckland Counc

10. Waitangi Tribunal - Wai 2200 A186 Scoping report [pdf, 3.3 MB]

    Wai 2200 Ngātiawa / Te Āti Awa Research Needs Scoping Report Tony Walzl WALGHAN PARTNERS 18 January 2016 Wai 2200 Porirua ki Manawatū District Inquiry Report commissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal Wai 2200, #A186 camerja Official camerja Received camerja Text Box 18 Jan 2016 2 Contents INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................