LCRO 203/2017 HI v JK (6 August 2020) [pdf, 314 KB]
...that date, that he would not be continuing to represent him, and was satisfied that he had met his obligation to assist Mr HI in securing the services of another lawyer. 22 [157] Mr JK says that if he had phoned Mr HI, he would have done so to check that Mr HI was okay. He says that he was particularly mindful that Mr HI became very apprehensive when required to attend court. [158] When considering the question as to whether Mr JK terminated the retainer without good cause, l...