1368 items matching your search terms
ALA v ITE NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 39 [12 April 2017] THERE IS AN ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF THE NAMES OF THE PARTIES AND ANY INFORMATION LEADING TO THE PARTIES’ IDENTITY IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 39 EMPC 282/2016 IN THE MATTER OF an application for orders under s 140(6) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 BETWEEN ALA Plaintiff AND ITE Defendant Hearing: 27, 28 February 2017 (heard at Taurang
...vulnerabilities to financing of terrorism offshore. Our Act makes it harder for criminals to launder money and provides a significant disincentive to carrying out the criminal activity in the first place. The Act requires businesses to, among other things, check customer’s identification, monitor accounts for suspicious activity, and report suspected money laundering and terrorism financing to the New Zealand Police. As a result, the Act will also make New Zealand less attractive as a...
...and house to Mr Stanley. Unfortunately the evidence is insufficient to show exactly what information was given to the accountant and therefore the basis for his view that there were no issues of concern. It would be wise for the trustees to re-check the matter with their accountant and I will give a direction accordingly at the end of the decision. Executive Trustee Position [102] The Tiroa E and Te Hape B trusts are, by anyone’s standards, large businesses with a special char...
...v Beattie (No 3) the plaintiff had raised concerns with the employer at a very early stage. That is not the position in the present case. The remaining two authorities are broadly consistent with the approach adopted in Coy v Commissioner of Police, where it was said that: 9 [6] So while the plaintiff is not entitled to rely upon events that occurred prior to 90 days before she raised the relevant personal grievances as independent disadvantage grievances, neither should she be...
...<Oliver.Sanders@justice.govt.nz>; Flay, Katy <Katy.Flay@justice.govt.nz> Cc: Klinger, Sophie <Sophie.Klinger@justice.govt.nz>; Smith, Harry <Harry.Smith@justice.govt.nz> Subject: RE: Update - final CAB paper and RIS reinstating three strikes Thanks, can I check if there is a plan for some high level judicial comms? Let me know I can help draft anything. Cheers Paul From: Sanders, Oliver <Oliver.Sanders@justice.govt.nz> Sent: Friday, 19 April 2024 9:21 am...
...revert to actual numbers of people in order to calculate muster numbers and numbers of starts. The process, then, is to make assumptions about trends in usage of three individual sentence types. This constrains the fourth, and a key ‘sanity check’ is to examine that constrained trend to see whether it is credible. If not, then the other three trends must be revisited, new assumptions made, and the process repeated. This graph shows the actual proportions of the four types...
FAMILY VIOLENCE RISK ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK | A common approach to screening, assessing and managing risk i Family Violence Risk Assessment and Management Framework A COMMON APPROACH TO SCREENING, ASSESSING AND MANAGING RISK FAMILY VIOLENCE RISK ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK | A common approach to screening, assessing and managing risk ii Ministry of Justice Tāhū o te Ture justice.govt.nz info@justice.govt.nz 0800 COURTS 0800 268 787 National Office Ju
...effort/cost to very high effort/cost. For details of the surveys, see appendix 4. Councils’ responses were weighted by size, using the number of FTE licensing inspectors given.7 7 As a further sensitivity check, the same analysis was run excluding Auckland Council data, given the high number of licensing inspectors employed by Auckland. This altered some of the absolute weightings shown in figure 5 for premises at the lower end of the sca...
...of powers and the independence of each of the three branches of government: the legislature (Parliament), the executive (Ministers of the Crown and government departments), and the judiciary. Each of these branches has a distinct role and acts as a check on the others. Parliament is responsible for making laws and the executive for administering them. The judiciary is responsible for interpreting the law and for independently and impartially resolving disputes in accordance with the law....
...9 54 Taitokerau MB 201 (54 TTK 201). 10 2013 Maori Appellate Court MB 181 (2013 APPEAL 181). 11 70 Taitokerau MB 286 (70 TTK 286). 12 Ibid at MB 312-314. 94 Taitokerau MB 140 1994 charter, will be checked by the trustees for compliance, and that all whānau trustee nomination forms received today will be sent to the Māori Land Court. Critically in terms of that resolution, there was no endorsement of the trustee nominees by the meeting