Search Results

1. [2024] NZEmpC 64 Joyce v Ultimate Siteworks Ltd [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...Ultimate Siteworks, it found that there was less fuel in the diesel bowser than expected. It considered that Mr Joyce may have taken fuel from the bowser, which Mr Joyce disputed, saying there was a leak. No leak was found when Ultimate Siteworks checked the bowser, but it has not pursued its claim with respect to the alleged missing fuel. [26] The evidence is unclear as to what steps Mr Joyce took to obtain new employment and when.5 He says that he was able to speak to people at...

2. Cook v Manawatu Community Law Centre [2021] NZHRRT 10 [pdf, 261 KB]

   ...documents from MCLC on Ms Cook’s file with WINZ. MCLC would have held those documents itself. [40.4] In relation to the request for details of the hours of employment that WINZ had noted on Ms Cook’s file, the inevitable conclusion is that MCLC was checking whether Ms Cook had correctly advised WINZ of her hours of work with MCLC; ie checking on Ms Cook’s veracity with WINZ. [41] We accept Ms Cook’s submission that the 8 July 2016 request was made not to assist her, but to ge...

3. Borst v ACC [2014] NZACA 8 [pdf, 232 KB]

   BEFORE THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY AT WELLINGTON [2014] NZACA 8 ACA 11/13 IN THE MATTER of the Accident Compensation Act 1982 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal pursuant to s.107 of the Act BETWEEN NOEL BORST Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent HEARING: 4 December 2013 at Auckland Supplementary submissions and evidence filed in March 2014 AUTHORITY: Robyn Bedford COUNSEL: Mr Darke, advoca

4. OIA-120214.pdf [pdf, 5 MB]

   ...an interim hearing takes place - Within 3 – 6 months directions are made to prepare the matter for trial. This may include a specialised report being ordered by the Court. At this stage FDR may be reconsidered. - Between 6 – 9 months compliance checks are conducted to ensure the matter is ready to go to trial. - A trial is held before 12 months from filing. Evatt List matters are high priority, so this is rarely delayed. - Pre-trial events are not always in person and can be conducted by...

5. OIA-111174.pdf [pdf, 25 MB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 30 July 2024 Our ref: OIA 111174 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Returning Offenders Thank you for your email of 8 April 2024 requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), documents relating to the management of offenders returning to New Zealand. Specifically, you requested: …any policy documents, memos, b

6. [2014] NZEmpC 188 The Warehouse Ltd v Harris [pdf, 501 KB]

   MARGARET HARRIS v THE WAREHOUSE LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 188 [3 October 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 188 ARC 8/14 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN MARGARET HARRIS Plaintiff AND THE WAREHOUSE LIMITED Defendant ARC 10/14 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN

7. 2020 archive

   Police Detention Legal Assistance (PDLA) provider survey on how rostering can be improved during the holiday period Legal aid payments published Criminal case assignment: Availability during the Christmas break Privacy Guidelines for providers of Justice services Special duty lawyer arrangements for the holiday period When the Aided Person in Waitangi Tribunal Proceedings Dies Criminal legal aid assignments published Where to send Civil Applications Paternity cases Cut-off date for invoices rem...

   Located in:

   1. About >
   2. Lawyers & service providers >
   3. Legal aid lawyers >
   4. Whats New for lawyers providing Legal Aid

8. Sansom v Department of Internal Affairs [2016] NZHRRT 17 [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...Dec 17, 2010, CB p2. My manager withheld her email from me, though she circulated the email to a great number of other staff. [44.2] Withholding the email from me, the subject of the email, was itself bad but worse was that Ms McCracken had not checked the statements she made about my health and injury in the email, and these were not just misleading and trivialising but one was false. When I returned to the office, at my manager’s request, on Jan 5, 2011, Ms McCracken must have reali...

9. INZ (Calder) v Cleland [2019] NZIACDT 25 (3 May 2019) [pdf, 252 KB]

   ...required to support a visa application. [36] Mr Cleland advised that he conducted a Skype interview with each applicant at which he discussed their visa options and the required documents. He also had a checklist for work visas and personally checked that he had every document and that it complied with Immigration New Zealand’s criteria. [37] Once there had been a Skype interview, no further immigration advice needed to be given until such time as Immigration New Zealand issued...

10. 20240930-Sentencing-Reform-Proactive-Release-2nd-Tranche_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 8.7 MB]

    ...the end sentence meets the purposes and principles of sentencing set out in the Sentencing Act. For example, to deter the offender or other persons from re-offending, or to assist in the offender’s rehabilitation and reintegration. 10. This sense check is not part of the structured process of uplifts and discounts that will be regulated by the new legislation. We do not expect that the Courts will use it to offset the cap on sentence discounts, as it serves a separate purpose from the t...