FZ v UL LCRO 257 / 2010 (17 October 2011) [pdf, 127 KB]
...that UL’s time recording system was a manual system. [42] In addition, a brief examination of the timesheets tends to support the inference that they were completed as matters proceeded, as dates for various events and correspondence can be checked off against what is known to have happened. To try to construct a timesheet after the event which coincides and matches the dates of various events would be extremely difficult. [43] UL’s hourly rate is $350.00 - that is not unreas...